Yes, when there are several different types living together somewhere, one kind usually does better. And they have plasmids containing genertic materials that help them cope with their surroundings. Often they trade these with each other, sometimes even species to species rather than just within species.
They also mutate in response to chemicals and radiation. Maybe all die except for the one mutating bacterium, but then it grows. This happens when people abuse antibiotic treatments or do not complete them. A big example is NYC drug addicts with HIV and TB. It's hard enough to kill TB if they complete their treatment, but when they stop after only one or two weeks, the TB recovers from the antibiotics used and develops resistance to them, producing MDRTB (multiply drug resistant TB) or if it is already MDRTB, it gets even more resistance to the latest ones for MDRTB. Also a big problem in Russian prisons and drug abusers.
The exact details are very long to answer here, but you can find out more on this subject at:
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultrane...
Also in the masterpiece best selling book, THE COMING PLAGUE, by Laurie Garrett, available in paperback now at any good bookstore. This is a VERY GOOD BOOK, far better than any best seller in this category, including by M.D. or PhD authors. In other words, I am telling you the author did more work, and better work on this than supposed experts have done. She gets PhD in Public Health *** laude from me.
I use both references, AND you haven't seen anything yet, just wait a very few more years, less than five, my friend.
Can bacteria mutate? how?
yes. They mutate to keep up with changes in their envorment
Reply:Yes and they do constantly.
Their DNA is attacked by environmental chemicals and toxins and background radio-activity.
Most mutations die off but there are so many bacteria that some will survive and reproduce.
Reply:Not as fast as viruses, but they do mutate. In fact, many are now resistant to antibiotics becasue of mutation. The non-resistant ones die off, leaving the resistant ones to prosper. Natural selection in a nutshell.
Reply:how i understand bacteria mutatin is mutation as in resistance to antibiotics. bacteria like all cells have organelles. one of which is the endoplasmic reticulum. there r two types of these namely smooth and rough ER. the sER is involved in drug detoxification and synthesis so when there is bacteria lets say within the stomach and we take drugs for this bacteria to kill it. it might work the first time but later on the bacterias sER will begin to adapt to the drug taken and soon it will b immune to the drug. that in itself is a mutation of the original bacteria to suit its environment in order to survive.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Give any five kinds of bacteria describing their common features?
1. enterococcus fecalis
2. eshericiia coli
3. yersinia pestis
4. pseudomonas aeruginosa
5. klebsiella pneumonia
they are all gram negative bacteria. they can cause urogenital disease and/or gastrointestinal disease, and they all have peptidoglycan in their cell walls.
street fighting
2. eshericiia coli
3. yersinia pestis
4. pseudomonas aeruginosa
5. klebsiella pneumonia
they are all gram negative bacteria. they can cause urogenital disease and/or gastrointestinal disease, and they all have peptidoglycan in their cell walls.
street fighting
Are bacteria growing in agar deeps motile?
how?
Are bacteria growing in agar deeps motile?
depends on the bacteria and the agar - if there is a lot of liquid left in the agar (soft agar) - they swim passively by water motion.
Some bacteria can actively swim (they have a flagellum) and move around in agar fairly well.
Are bacteria growing in agar deeps motile?
depends on the bacteria and the agar - if there is a lot of liquid left in the agar (soft agar) - they swim passively by water motion.
Some bacteria can actively swim (they have a flagellum) and move around in agar fairly well.
Can bacteria be transmitted through animals?Can antibiotics fight help fight viral and bacterial diseases?
Yes - bacteria could be transmitted through animals (through saliva, feces, blood, etc)
Yes - antibiotics can help fight BACTERIA
NO - antibiotics will not fight VIRUSES
Can bacteria be transmitted through animals?Can antibiotics fight help fight viral and bacterial diseases?
sure! they can.
Reply:firstly what do u mean can bacteria can be transmitted through animals??
i think u mean can an animal get infected by a bacteria infection then yes they can.
antibacteria agents can help fight bacterial diseases,
ill tell you how!
u know what peptidoglycans are ?? they are a component of the cell wall the bacteria has, penicillin binds to a pinicillin binding protein in the bacteria and this will prevent the growth of cell wall, this will lead the bacteria to release enzymes such as lysis which will destroy it and this is all due to fragile celll wall,
Viruses has No enzymes = no metabolism = resistance to true antibiotics
Most viruses are:
very susceptible to oxidising agents and radiation damage
resistant to quaternary ammonium and other biocides
Viruses with a lipid envelope are damaged by organic solvents and detergents
Many viruses are inactivated by;
extremes of pH
drying
moderate heating, e.g. 50°C for 30 minutes,
but survive freezing well.
hope this helped :P, if u have anymore questions
dnt hesitate to email me:-
noname_2001_2002@yahoo.co.uk
take care
Yes - antibiotics can help fight BACTERIA
NO - antibiotics will not fight VIRUSES
Can bacteria be transmitted through animals?Can antibiotics fight help fight viral and bacterial diseases?
sure! they can.
Reply:firstly what do u mean can bacteria can be transmitted through animals??
i think u mean can an animal get infected by a bacteria infection then yes they can.
antibacteria agents can help fight bacterial diseases,
ill tell you how!
u know what peptidoglycans are ?? they are a component of the cell wall the bacteria has, penicillin binds to a pinicillin binding protein in the bacteria and this will prevent the growth of cell wall, this will lead the bacteria to release enzymes such as lysis which will destroy it and this is all due to fragile celll wall,
Viruses has No enzymes = no metabolism = resistance to true antibiotics
Most viruses are:
very susceptible to oxidising agents and radiation damage
resistant to quaternary ammonium and other biocides
Viruses with a lipid envelope are damaged by organic solvents and detergents
Many viruses are inactivated by;
extremes of pH
drying
moderate heating, e.g. 50°C for 30 minutes,
but survive freezing well.
hope this helped :P, if u have anymore questions
dnt hesitate to email me:-
noname_2001_2002@yahoo.co.uk
take care
What bacteria is commonly found in soil and dust?
pseodomonas aeruginosa. It causes a very bad infection and is the reason visitors are often forbidden to take live flowers into hospitals. It is also very hard to get rid of.
Some bacteria have a thickened slime layer that is called a/an...?
A capsule
A mucilaginous layer
Some bacteria have a thickened slime layer that is called a/an...?
look online
Reply:a lawyer.
Reply:ugh, i forgot! but it coats the outside of the cell and yeah, it's slimy
muco-something?
grappling
A mucilaginous layer
Some bacteria have a thickened slime layer that is called a/an...?
look online
Reply:a lawyer.
Reply:ugh, i forgot! but it coats the outside of the cell and yeah, it's slimy
muco-something?
grappling
What bacteria is in soap scum?
None.....soap scum is a chemical reaction.
Mold is the most common thing you find in the shower.
Bleach will destroy both of these.
What bacteria is in soap scum?
Long technical read here:
http://www.asm.org/ASM/files/LeftMarginH...
Reply:some bathroom foam cleaners can dissolve soap scum look at the uses of the cleaning product in the directions on the back of the can
Mold is the most common thing you find in the shower.
Bleach will destroy both of these.
What bacteria is in soap scum?
Long technical read here:
http://www.asm.org/ASM/files/LeftMarginH...
Reply:some bathroom foam cleaners can dissolve soap scum look at the uses of the cleaning product in the directions on the back of the can
What bacteria is in soap scum?
None.....soap scum is a chemical reaction.
Mold is the most common thing you find in the shower.
Bleach will destroy both of these.
What bacteria is in soap scum?
Long technical read here:
http://www.asm.org/ASM/files/LeftMarginH...
Reply:some bathroom foam cleaners can dissolve soap scum look at the uses of the cleaning product in the directions on the back of the can
Mold is the most common thing you find in the shower.
Bleach will destroy both of these.
What bacteria is in soap scum?
Long technical read here:
http://www.asm.org/ASM/files/LeftMarginH...
Reply:some bathroom foam cleaners can dissolve soap scum look at the uses of the cleaning product in the directions on the back of the can
Puppy bacteria help?
My question is has anyone used Metronidazole before has it helped .?for giardia
Puppy bacteria help?
I'm pretty sure that metronidazole is the only medication that is used to treat Giardia. It's an antibiotic that also helps reduce inflammation in the colon. It is frequently prescribed for dogs with diarrhea, but for giardia a larger dose for a longer amount of time is frequently prescribed.
It is also sometimes called "Flagyl" (the brand name). Try googling it and see what you come up with.
ADD: It is very effective for the treatment of giardia. Reinfection occurs when your dog contracts the parasite from contaminated water sources, IE drinking water out of lakes or ponds that fecal matter from infected animals runs into. You can also research what giardia is and how it is passed on the Center For Disease Control government website, http://www.cdc.gov
Reply:that is a question for your vet. has the pup been tested for giardia and if so was this med given by the vet? if so then use it they know best on treatments
Reply:Yes, metronidazole is a very effective antibacterial and antiprotozoal agent for treating giardia.
Reply:Get your puppy on canine Essentials, this will help with the bacteria, and help the puppys immuine system.I give this to my dog everyday.And she is very healthy.
Puppy bacteria help?
I'm pretty sure that metronidazole is the only medication that is used to treat Giardia. It's an antibiotic that also helps reduce inflammation in the colon. It is frequently prescribed for dogs with diarrhea, but for giardia a larger dose for a longer amount of time is frequently prescribed.
It is also sometimes called "Flagyl" (the brand name). Try googling it and see what you come up with.
ADD: It is very effective for the treatment of giardia. Reinfection occurs when your dog contracts the parasite from contaminated water sources, IE drinking water out of lakes or ponds that fecal matter from infected animals runs into. You can also research what giardia is and how it is passed on the Center For Disease Control government website, http://www.cdc.gov
Reply:that is a question for your vet. has the pup been tested for giardia and if so was this med given by the vet? if so then use it they know best on treatments
Reply:Yes, metronidazole is a very effective antibacterial and antiprotozoal agent for treating giardia.
Reply:Get your puppy on canine Essentials, this will help with the bacteria, and help the puppys immuine system.I give this to my dog everyday.And she is very healthy.
If bacteria only reproduce asexually, how can they transfer genes?
Explain what methods and how it is accomplished.
If bacteria only reproduce asexually, how can they transfer genes?
it is called lateral or horizontal gene tranfer. Basically two bacteria join, exchange genetic material, separate. Result two bacteria each of which has now different genetic material than they had before having sex. Can only work in unicellular organisms.
Look up more on the web or in your text book
Reply:Um....when they REPRODUCE they create a complete COPY of themselves....GENETICALLY! DUH!
Reply:They don't just reproduce asexually. They do pair up and swap genes as well. It's more of a merging than sex, as such.
Reply:i no that i just dunno how to explain it wish i could be of more help but id say ud find out moer about it if you googled it bit by bit
Reply:It's called conjunction. One bacteria uses a "sex pilus" to inject some DNA into another bacteria, thus they transfer genes. (and as someone else pointed out, that's called horizontal gene transfer)
There is another way that genes can get to one bacterium to another, and that's transduction. That is where a bacteria gets DNA from a bacteriophage, a virus that can pick up DNA from one cell and give it to another.
yoga
If bacteria only reproduce asexually, how can they transfer genes?
it is called lateral or horizontal gene tranfer. Basically two bacteria join, exchange genetic material, separate. Result two bacteria each of which has now different genetic material than they had before having sex. Can only work in unicellular organisms.
Look up more on the web or in your text book
Reply:Um....when they REPRODUCE they create a complete COPY of themselves....GENETICALLY! DUH!
Reply:They don't just reproduce asexually. They do pair up and swap genes as well. It's more of a merging than sex, as such.
Reply:i no that i just dunno how to explain it wish i could be of more help but id say ud find out moer about it if you googled it bit by bit
Reply:It's called conjunction. One bacteria uses a "sex pilus" to inject some DNA into another bacteria, thus they transfer genes. (and as someone else pointed out, that's called horizontal gene transfer)
There is another way that genes can get to one bacterium to another, and that's transduction. That is where a bacteria gets DNA from a bacteriophage, a virus that can pick up DNA from one cell and give it to another.
yoga
Can bacteria form in scar tissue, to cause an abscess?
also it has whitish yellow puss comeing from the absess, it smells very bad, so i think it is bacterial. does that sound accurate? i got a doc appt for it already just in case i need a topical antibiotic/antiviral.
Can bacteria form in scar tissue, to cause an abscess?
yes puss also known as abcess can form inside scar tissue, yes abcess does smell very bad and has a mucusy white yellow tinge. Antibitoics will clear it up :).
Reply:yeah, just ask any heroin addict.
Can bacteria form in scar tissue, to cause an abscess?
yes puss also known as abcess can form inside scar tissue, yes abcess does smell very bad and has a mucusy white yellow tinge. Antibitoics will clear it up :).
Reply:yeah, just ask any heroin addict.
Can bacteria and/or germs travel up the flowing water coming out of a faucet?
If you used a dirty cup or bottle at the water cooler at work, can the germs travel up the "stream" of water coming out of the cooler and contaminate the rest of the water?
Can bacteria and/or germs travel up the flowing water coming out of a faucet?
Yes, if the contaminated container contacts the water dispensor spigot and there is a trace of biofilm there. The micro-organism might enter the gel of that biofilm, be sheltered from the water pressureof fluid outflow and then work its way up through the matrix of the biofilm gel.
Reply:Thanks everyone Report It
Reply:Noway do u have any idea how small and slow bacteria are?? most of them can't even move! so no don't worry about it they cant. unless you touch the dirty cup to the faucet, then the faucet might get contaminated.
Reply:It depends on how strong the bacteria are, but generally hot water kills the bacteria before they have a chance to get up there. But it is possible.
Reply:Yes............use filtered water. There is plenty of reading material on this subject. You can get bacteria and viruses and various types of poisoning from the chemicals put into the water and natural things such as lead, etc.
Reply:dont worry about that think about how a water cooler works when you stop the cooler the stream of water is cut off and the rest falls there is no suction to pull the water up into the cooler. But if you did touch the bottle to te cooler baceria could be tranferred although they wouldnt multiply very much because of a lack of nutrients
Reply:don't know but from experience i can vouch that any extention of that flow ie to a man electricity does ouch!
ivy
Can bacteria and/or germs travel up the flowing water coming out of a faucet?
Yes, if the contaminated container contacts the water dispensor spigot and there is a trace of biofilm there. The micro-organism might enter the gel of that biofilm, be sheltered from the water pressureof fluid outflow and then work its way up through the matrix of the biofilm gel.
Reply:Thanks everyone Report It
Reply:Noway do u have any idea how small and slow bacteria are?? most of them can't even move! so no don't worry about it they cant. unless you touch the dirty cup to the faucet, then the faucet might get contaminated.
Reply:It depends on how strong the bacteria are, but generally hot water kills the bacteria before they have a chance to get up there. But it is possible.
Reply:Yes............use filtered water. There is plenty of reading material on this subject. You can get bacteria and viruses and various types of poisoning from the chemicals put into the water and natural things such as lead, etc.
Reply:dont worry about that think about how a water cooler works when you stop the cooler the stream of water is cut off and the rest falls there is no suction to pull the water up into the cooler. But if you did touch the bottle to te cooler baceria could be tranferred although they wouldnt multiply very much because of a lack of nutrients
Reply:don't know but from experience i can vouch that any extention of that flow ie to a man electricity does ouch!
ivy
Is bacteria Neisseria meningitidis a eukaryotic cell or prokaryotic?
it causes meningitis
Is bacteria Neisseria meningitidis a eukaryotic cell or prokaryotic?
Kingdom: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Beta Proteobacteria
Order: Neisseriales
Family: Neisseriaceae
Genus: Neisseria
Species: N. meningitidis
Neisseria meningitidis, also simply known as meningococcus, is a gram-negative diplococcal bacterium best known for its role in meningitis.[1] It only infects humans; there is no animal reservoir. It is the only form of bacterial meningitis known to cause epidemics.
Reply:pro - all bacteria are, aren't they....
Reply:a bacteria is always prokaryotic.
Reply:all bacteria are prokaryotic
Is bacteria Neisseria meningitidis a eukaryotic cell or prokaryotic?
Kingdom: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Beta Proteobacteria
Order: Neisseriales
Family: Neisseriaceae
Genus: Neisseria
Species: N. meningitidis
Neisseria meningitidis, also simply known as meningococcus, is a gram-negative diplococcal bacterium best known for its role in meningitis.[1] It only infects humans; there is no animal reservoir. It is the only form of bacterial meningitis known to cause epidemics.
Reply:pro - all bacteria are, aren't they....
Reply:a bacteria is always prokaryotic.
Reply:all bacteria are prokaryotic
"support bacteria, it is the only culture some people have"?
Sorry but what does this means? :P
"support bacteria, it is the only culture some people have"?
This is a play on words, or a joke. Bacteria grown in laboratories are often referred to as "cultures". People who behave poorly or crudely often are said to "have no culture".
Reply:Haha, that's actually pretty funny.
"support bacteria, it is the only culture some people have"?
This is a play on words, or a joke. Bacteria grown in laboratories are often referred to as "cultures". People who behave poorly or crudely often are said to "have no culture".
Reply:Haha, that's actually pretty funny.
Will bacteria, fungi etc trapped in kitchen hood cause health problems?
if you have a kitchen hood, you should also have a filter on it. most filters are stainless steel, flexible, and pop out of the frame for easy cleaning. you should remove that filter at least once a year, depending on the frequency of use of your cooktop, and let it soak in a hot bleach/detergent bath for a minimum of 30 minutes. rinse thoroughly in hot hot hot hot water, being careful not to burn your hands under the water and let it air-dry, then replace it. hope this helped you!!!
Will bacteria, fungi etc trapped in kitchen hood cause health problems?
probly
Reply:yeah, it's one of the health code checks in any restauraunt. You have to clean with bleach to get rid of it. It's the same thing as having it stuck in your walls. People get sued all the time over stuff like that. I haven't heard of any recent homes or food joints getting closed, but that's because of the health checks. You don't have too many people getting their homes checked for fungi or bacteria.
Reply:I'm sure, I mean that stuff is so nastey and it just sitting there near your food can not be good
Will bacteria, fungi etc trapped in kitchen hood cause health problems?
probly
Reply:yeah, it's one of the health code checks in any restauraunt. You have to clean with bleach to get rid of it. It's the same thing as having it stuck in your walls. People get sued all the time over stuff like that. I haven't heard of any recent homes or food joints getting closed, but that's because of the health checks. You don't have too many people getting their homes checked for fungi or bacteria.
Reply:I'm sure, I mean that stuff is so nastey and it just sitting there near your food can not be good
Are bacteria and virus single celled or multicellular?
For an homework assignment
Are bacteria and virus single celled or multicellular?
single for bacteria but for virus multi cell
Reply:Multi.
Reply:Viruses don't have cells because they can't carry out the six features of life on their own. I also think that bacteria can be either single or multicellular.
Reply:bacteria are single celled. virus' can b multicellular. but dnt ask me. thats wat sites liek google and yahoo and ask.com are for.
Reply:Bacteria are single-celled. Viruses are acellular (they're not cells at all).
Reply:I would say the are multi
Reply:bacterias are single celled for sure!
Virus are not assumed as single celled becouse there's no cell wall in virus,and there're not multicellur!we can say acellular
fuchsia
Are bacteria and virus single celled or multicellular?
single for bacteria but for virus multi cell
Reply:Multi.
Reply:Viruses don't have cells because they can't carry out the six features of life on their own. I also think that bacteria can be either single or multicellular.
Reply:bacteria are single celled. virus' can b multicellular. but dnt ask me. thats wat sites liek google and yahoo and ask.com are for.
Reply:Bacteria are single-celled. Viruses are acellular (they're not cells at all).
Reply:I would say the are multi
Reply:bacterias are single celled for sure!
Virus are not assumed as single celled becouse there's no cell wall in virus,and there're not multicellur!we can say acellular
fuchsia
Is bacteria made of tissues, organs and/or organ systems?
Bacteria are not at all similar to cellular organisms.
They have no tissue or organs, since those are composed of cells.
Bacteria are much smaller and simpler than cells, although their DNA is surprisingly complex.
Bacteria are actually quite fascinating and they have many interesting facets that are not found at all in cellular organisms. The flagellum, for example, in some varieties is powered by a tiny microscopic motor that is powered by acid.
The world of bacteria is only now beginning to be opened up through the relatively young science of microbiology. I would encourage to read more about them if you think you would find it interesting.
After seeing the other comments, I felt compelled to add that bacteria are NOT cells.
Is bacteria made of tissues, organs and/or organ systems?
no, bacteria are single cell organisms
Reply:a bacterium is an organism..not made of tissue nor organs
Reply:they aren't any - thay are jus a single cell
Reply:Bacteria have some "organelles", but no tissues, organs, or organ systems as such.
They are single-celled organisms.
Reply:Bacteria are single celled organisms.
Tissues are made of cells and organs are made of tissues.
Bacteria however, can't make tissues or organs.
Reply:they r living organisms,made up of single cells,i guessss
They have no tissue or organs, since those are composed of cells.
Bacteria are much smaller and simpler than cells, although their DNA is surprisingly complex.
Bacteria are actually quite fascinating and they have many interesting facets that are not found at all in cellular organisms. The flagellum, for example, in some varieties is powered by a tiny microscopic motor that is powered by acid.
The world of bacteria is only now beginning to be opened up through the relatively young science of microbiology. I would encourage to read more about them if you think you would find it interesting.
After seeing the other comments, I felt compelled to add that bacteria are NOT cells.
Is bacteria made of tissues, organs and/or organ systems?
no, bacteria are single cell organisms
Reply:a bacterium is an organism..not made of tissue nor organs
Reply:they aren't any - thay are jus a single cell
Reply:Bacteria have some "organelles", but no tissues, organs, or organ systems as such.
They are single-celled organisms.
Reply:Bacteria are single celled organisms.
Tissues are made of cells and organs are made of tissues.
Bacteria however, can't make tissues or organs.
Reply:they r living organisms,made up of single cells,i guessss
Can Bacteria can be transmitted through animals?
Ah, yes, bacteria are actually everywhere. Even inside your guts, your blood stream, the carpet, the spoons, even in the air you breathe, they thrive everywhere in this planet. Some even survive to extreme temperatures, pressures... Oh, and antibiotics are to kill bacteria, but remember, when you got the flu, if you take antibiotics it won't work at all, because the flu is a virus, not a bacteria.
Can Bacteria can be transmitted through animals?
Absolutely....most common cause of food poisoning is the growth and transfer of bacteria in meat not sufficiently cooked (or left go too long after cooking and before eating)....so can parasites such as muscle worms (pigs and bears) and several other nasties...that is why people 'cook' meat...thousands of years of pain and suffering have taught us to.
Reply:absolutely!!!
Can Bacteria can be transmitted through animals?
Absolutely....most common cause of food poisoning is the growth and transfer of bacteria in meat not sufficiently cooked (or left go too long after cooking and before eating)....so can parasites such as muscle worms (pigs and bears) and several other nasties...that is why people 'cook' meat...thousands of years of pain and suffering have taught us to.
Reply:absolutely!!!
What bacteria was sent into space in 2006 for research on the shuttle?
Salmonella. ANd it came back nastier and stronger. Yikes
Aerobic bacteria need: a)water b)land c)oxygen d)light?
aerobic means they need oxygen...anearobic dont need oxygen.
Aerobic bacteria need: a)water b)land c)oxygen d)light?
C
Reply:aerobic= with air so i guess oxygen.
Reply:c)oxygen
Reply:Aerobic bacteria needs oxygen and anaerobic bacteria needs very little or no oxygen to live
Reply:i say c.
paper bush
Aerobic bacteria need: a)water b)land c)oxygen d)light?
C
Reply:aerobic= with air so i guess oxygen.
Reply:c)oxygen
Reply:Aerobic bacteria needs oxygen and anaerobic bacteria needs very little or no oxygen to live
Reply:i say c.
paper bush
Ocean bacteria produces more CO2 than anything else on earth. Can it be stopped? What causes it?
Luckily ocean bacteria does not produce more CO2 than anything else on earth... In fact, it appears the entire story was a hoax. See http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.... for more.
Ocean bacteria produces more CO2 than anything else on earth. Can it be stopped? What causes it?
Joan's rating quote is cracking me up. Thanks Joan! Report It
Reply:Wrong!
Reply:You are messing with something more powerful than you if you try to change nature, And Nature does bit
But I deserve a hot Juicy Burger, And So do you.
Reply:It is the ultimate egotist who thinks he or she can control the climate or nature in other ways. As intelligent as our science has become, it has yet to scatch the surface of existence. Remember that in ages past, they really believed they had all the answers too. They were wrong then and the egotists of today are too.
Reply:Bacteria that occurs naturally in the sea should not be stopped. It's part of nature. Simple as that.
Ocean bacteria produces more CO2 than anything else on earth. Can it be stopped? What causes it?
Joan's rating quote is cracking me up. Thanks Joan! Report It
Reply:Wrong!
Reply:You are messing with something more powerful than you if you try to change nature, And Nature does bit
But I deserve a hot Juicy Burger, And So do you.
Reply:It is the ultimate egotist who thinks he or she can control the climate or nature in other ways. As intelligent as our science has become, it has yet to scatch the surface of existence. Remember that in ages past, they really believed they had all the answers too. They were wrong then and the egotists of today are too.
Reply:Bacteria that occurs naturally in the sea should not be stopped. It's part of nature. Simple as that.
Is bacteria mentioned in any of the holy scriptures?
The ickle buggers seem to do a lot of harm in this World...surely if God had made them he would have given them a mention?
Is bacteria mentioned in any of the holy scriptures?
Heb 11:34 and sars was upon the land, and there was a great wailing, and a great taking of moldy bread.
In this time there goeth a rock upon the land called crack. Do not taketh that, it will be like a plague upon you.
As well trusteth not adjustable rate mortgages.
Reply:As the bible was written by people without microscopes, no.
Reply:Not specifically. You imply rather unexpected sexual activities to such small creatures!!
Reply:no it also doesn't mention why we have to have periods EVERY MONTH! cute doggie by the way
Reply:He did.
He told the Jews not to eat shellfish ... did you think He did it because He hates lobsters? lol It was because (as we all know now) if you don't cook it live, it's no good.
He told the Jews not to eat pork ... did you think it was because He didn't want them to be called pigs? No, it was because pigs back then were not grain fed like now, they were scavengers who literally ate excrement if allowed. Pigs don't have the stomachs like a cow to process that, so it goes into their fat and meat. Hence, full of bacteria that can make you sick.
Reply:I really dont know but your puppy avatar is so cute!
Of course it isnt as cute as mine :p
EDIT
actually I dont really think they are mentioned except briefly in the stupid Armagedon thats "supposed to happen"
Reply:No, Instead the bible refers to demons. Biblical medical practices mostly consist of sacrificing animals or birds. You don't see too many Christians sacrificing pidgeons any more though, even though the bible clearly tells them to.
Reply:The bible left a lot of things out. God probably figured it was already long enough...
Also, although the writers knew what to say through God, he put it in human hands so the language could be understood. That's why the old testament is filled with long and really weird sounding names and measurements, and why bats are called birds, because that's what everyone called them back then.
God doesn't bring up a lot of things; the platypus, black people (though they come up in the new testament), coconuts, Albinos. In fact, God intentionally left out the biggest detail of all, when Jesus would return. In case you haven't noticed, every generation has predicted he's about to come and his reign would begin, and they were all wrong, because Jesus left us hanging on purpose.
So if God would leave that out, is it so surprising he wouldn't bother telling the writers about little invisible animals that make you sick?
Note: Bacteria are not part of the animal kingdom as defined today, but taxonomy was very different 6 thousand years ago, they would have almost definitely been referred to as animals back then.
Reply:Yea, I'd like to see Noah collecting 2 of every bacteria, but hey, i think its obvious to EVERYONE that that story is genuinly a STORY
Reply:Not only does He take the credit for creating the Ecoli bacillus (and the Black Death as well) but he made sure Noah took two of every specvies of bacterium onto the Ark
I don't think they took up much room, but my God it must have been difficult finding them in the first place!!!
cf Noah was a bloody fool- he had the chance to rid the world of every plague bacillus, bloody housefly and sea gull, but instead made sure they were preserved in his Ark. What a tosser!
Is bacteria mentioned in any of the holy scriptures?
Heb 11:34 and sars was upon the land, and there was a great wailing, and a great taking of moldy bread.
In this time there goeth a rock upon the land called crack. Do not taketh that, it will be like a plague upon you.
As well trusteth not adjustable rate mortgages.
Reply:As the bible was written by people without microscopes, no.
Reply:Not specifically. You imply rather unexpected sexual activities to such small creatures!!
Reply:no it also doesn't mention why we have to have periods EVERY MONTH! cute doggie by the way
Reply:He did.
He told the Jews not to eat shellfish ... did you think He did it because He hates lobsters? lol It was because (as we all know now) if you don't cook it live, it's no good.
He told the Jews not to eat pork ... did you think it was because He didn't want them to be called pigs? No, it was because pigs back then were not grain fed like now, they were scavengers who literally ate excrement if allowed. Pigs don't have the stomachs like a cow to process that, so it goes into their fat and meat. Hence, full of bacteria that can make you sick.
Reply:I really dont know but your puppy avatar is so cute!
Of course it isnt as cute as mine :p
EDIT
actually I dont really think they are mentioned except briefly in the stupid Armagedon thats "supposed to happen"
Reply:No, Instead the bible refers to demons. Biblical medical practices mostly consist of sacrificing animals or birds. You don't see too many Christians sacrificing pidgeons any more though, even though the bible clearly tells them to.
Reply:The bible left a lot of things out. God probably figured it was already long enough...
Also, although the writers knew what to say through God, he put it in human hands so the language could be understood. That's why the old testament is filled with long and really weird sounding names and measurements, and why bats are called birds, because that's what everyone called them back then.
God doesn't bring up a lot of things; the platypus, black people (though they come up in the new testament), coconuts, Albinos. In fact, God intentionally left out the biggest detail of all, when Jesus would return. In case you haven't noticed, every generation has predicted he's about to come and his reign would begin, and they were all wrong, because Jesus left us hanging on purpose.
So if God would leave that out, is it so surprising he wouldn't bother telling the writers about little invisible animals that make you sick?
Note: Bacteria are not part of the animal kingdom as defined today, but taxonomy was very different 6 thousand years ago, they would have almost definitely been referred to as animals back then.
Reply:Yea, I'd like to see Noah collecting 2 of every bacteria, but hey, i think its obvious to EVERYONE that that story is genuinly a STORY
Reply:Not only does He take the credit for creating the Ecoli bacillus (and the Black Death as well) but he made sure Noah took two of every specvies of bacterium onto the Ark
I don't think they took up much room, but my God it must have been difficult finding them in the first place!!!
cf Noah was a bloody fool- he had the chance to rid the world of every plague bacillus, bloody housefly and sea gull, but instead made sure they were preserved in his Ark. What a tosser!
Good bacteria cultures in yogurt help yeast infections, doesnt sugar in the yogurt have a counter effect?
I've heard that sugar feeds yeast infections?
So is eating yogurt a good or bad idea to help prevent yeast infections?
Good bacteria cultures in yogurt help yeast infections, doesnt sugar in the yogurt have a counter effect?
You can always purchase sugar free yogurt.
You can also just count the carbs as part of your meal and cover for it.
BTW- no one with diabetes should eat raw milk.We catch infections easier than others who do not have compromised immune systems.
An infection will raise our sugars and thus be harder to control.
No raw honey either.
It is much safer for us to eat foods that have been pasteurized.
Reply:I'm not convinced that the sugar in yogurt feeds the yeast infections, but it surely does play havoc with my glucose readings!!!
Reply:When I eat yogurt I look for plain w/ live cultures ( raw milk kind if available). You do need to pay attention to the sugar content or it will defeat the purpose. Plain is best with fresh fruit and something like wheat germ for crunch.
Check out these links for info on the benefits of raw milk:
http://www.realmilk.com/healthbenefits.h...
http://www.rawmilk.org/
Good luck
Edit: I am not a doctor, I'm only speaking from personal experience.
I began drink raw/unpasturized milk and eating raw milk yogurt and cheese when I began working for a fomager in a cheee shop. I noticed that my blood readings dropped from 175 fasting in the am to 115-120. I developed no infections, and have always been prone to them, and I had no indigestion which I normally get when drinking milk.
The ability to purchase unpasturized products is becoming easier and many alternative doctors, natropaths %26amp; homopaths, will tell you that raw is better.
In europe and other parts of the world, it's common to find these foods and perfectly healthy.
Of course....speak to your doctor first before starting anything. I did and after giving her information on the benefits and saftey factors enforced on farms that are allowed to sell these products, she agreed and has since recommended it to other patients.
I , also, suffer from no yeasts infections when ingesting raw/unpasteruized products...so for me, it works.
Do the research yourself.....maybe it will, maybe it won't be the right thing for you, but atleast check it out.
Reply:You can easily purchase sugar-free yogurt. It is delicious.
So is eating yogurt a good or bad idea to help prevent yeast infections?
Good bacteria cultures in yogurt help yeast infections, doesnt sugar in the yogurt have a counter effect?
You can always purchase sugar free yogurt.
You can also just count the carbs as part of your meal and cover for it.
BTW- no one with diabetes should eat raw milk.We catch infections easier than others who do not have compromised immune systems.
An infection will raise our sugars and thus be harder to control.
No raw honey either.
It is much safer for us to eat foods that have been pasteurized.
Reply:I'm not convinced that the sugar in yogurt feeds the yeast infections, but it surely does play havoc with my glucose readings!!!
Reply:When I eat yogurt I look for plain w/ live cultures ( raw milk kind if available). You do need to pay attention to the sugar content or it will defeat the purpose. Plain is best with fresh fruit and something like wheat germ for crunch.
Check out these links for info on the benefits of raw milk:
http://www.realmilk.com/healthbenefits.h...
http://www.rawmilk.org/
Good luck
Edit: I am not a doctor, I'm only speaking from personal experience.
I began drink raw/unpasturized milk and eating raw milk yogurt and cheese when I began working for a fomager in a cheee shop. I noticed that my blood readings dropped from 175 fasting in the am to 115-120. I developed no infections, and have always been prone to them, and I had no indigestion which I normally get when drinking milk.
The ability to purchase unpasturized products is becoming easier and many alternative doctors, natropaths %26amp; homopaths, will tell you that raw is better.
In europe and other parts of the world, it's common to find these foods and perfectly healthy.
Of course....speak to your doctor first before starting anything. I did and after giving her information on the benefits and saftey factors enforced on farms that are allowed to sell these products, she agreed and has since recommended it to other patients.
I , also, suffer from no yeasts infections when ingesting raw/unpasteruized products...so for me, it works.
Do the research yourself.....maybe it will, maybe it won't be the right thing for you, but atleast check it out.
Reply:You can easily purchase sugar-free yogurt. It is delicious.
Cyano bacteria ,sick of it!?
tried chem clean and it worked but came back to haunt my 125, 4 month later.Any miracle cures?I've heard several things but im in dought .
Help Magicman! ty
Cyano bacteria ,sick of it!?
I was unusual in that I had a cyano bacteria bloom in a tank just 3 months old. Did some research at wetwebmedia and several references to red legged crabs being eaters of that type were discussed so I tried it.
I only bought a couple of them, took a couple of weeks, but the bottom line is that they worked and I have not had a reoccurrence in over a year now. Not saying it is the ultimate answer for you, but it might be a place for you to begin, along with some of the maintenance tips provided by other answerers.
Hope this helps.
Reply:I recommend using about half the recommended dose of Algone. This cleared my tank up in a couple of days.
Generally, I always use lower doses of medication then recommended, so as to not shock my fishies!
Hope this helps you.
Reply:Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to get rid of. I have tried the black out method where you cover the tank so it gets no light at all for 3 days. That works but as you said, it seem to come back. I have heard and read of people using Maracyn (I think) with success but have not tried that myself.
When I had it so bad in my 29 gallon tank, I finally just started over and it never came back. I still have it in my betta tank and will be redoing it soon.
Reply:Try this site
http://reefsources.itgo.com/features/art...
In short
Protein skimming
Maintenance animals
Increased flow
Feed lightly
Vacuum substrate or bottom
Harvest algae
Stop adding supplements
Regular water changes
Use RO/DI water
Top-off with Kalkwasser
Regular bulb changes
The Protien skimming, RO/DI water and Maintenance animals worked for me.
Reply:Physically remove as much of the cyano as you can.
If you aren't using already, use RO or RO/DI water.
Increase water flow and circulation to eliminate low flow or 'dead areas' in the tank.
Utilize a macroalgae packed refugium to outcompete the cyano and a protein skimmer.
daphne
Help Magicman! ty
Cyano bacteria ,sick of it!?
I was unusual in that I had a cyano bacteria bloom in a tank just 3 months old. Did some research at wetwebmedia and several references to red legged crabs being eaters of that type were discussed so I tried it.
I only bought a couple of them, took a couple of weeks, but the bottom line is that they worked and I have not had a reoccurrence in over a year now. Not saying it is the ultimate answer for you, but it might be a place for you to begin, along with some of the maintenance tips provided by other answerers.
Hope this helps.
Reply:I recommend using about half the recommended dose of Algone. This cleared my tank up in a couple of days.
Generally, I always use lower doses of medication then recommended, so as to not shock my fishies!
Hope this helps you.
Reply:Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to get rid of. I have tried the black out method where you cover the tank so it gets no light at all for 3 days. That works but as you said, it seem to come back. I have heard and read of people using Maracyn (I think) with success but have not tried that myself.
When I had it so bad in my 29 gallon tank, I finally just started over and it never came back. I still have it in my betta tank and will be redoing it soon.
Reply:Try this site
http://reefsources.itgo.com/features/art...
In short
Protein skimming
Maintenance animals
Increased flow
Feed lightly
Vacuum substrate or bottom
Harvest algae
Stop adding supplements
Regular water changes
Use RO/DI water
Top-off with Kalkwasser
Regular bulb changes
The Protien skimming, RO/DI water and Maintenance animals worked for me.
Reply:Physically remove as much of the cyano as you can.
If you aren't using already, use RO or RO/DI water.
Increase water flow and circulation to eliminate low flow or 'dead areas' in the tank.
Utilize a macroalgae packed refugium to outcompete the cyano and a protein skimmer.
daphne
Does Bacteria and Virus have anything in common?
I already know the differences between the both, I just want to know if they have any similarities.
Does Bacteria and Virus have anything in common?
They're both microscopic multi-celled organisms that can only survive off of a foreign body!
Reply:Yes they both infect other bodies.
Reply:They both can't be seen by the human eye. They both usually trigger the body's immune system. They both often cause disease, just not the same ones. They are both unicellular organisms.
Reply:Um I think both can cause u to become sick
Reply:Isn't a virus composed of bacteria? I mean, if you get sick...you've contracted some form of bacteria...hence the word "virus"... I could be wrong.
Reply:Well bactiria doesn't have a nucleus and a virus does so I think a virus is more serious than bacteria.
Reply:They both cause sickness.
Reply:They are both microscopic and can be harmful to the body
Does Bacteria and Virus have anything in common?
They're both microscopic multi-celled organisms that can only survive off of a foreign body!
Reply:Yes they both infect other bodies.
Reply:They both can't be seen by the human eye. They both usually trigger the body's immune system. They both often cause disease, just not the same ones. They are both unicellular organisms.
Reply:Um I think both can cause u to become sick
Reply:Isn't a virus composed of bacteria? I mean, if you get sick...you've contracted some form of bacteria...hence the word "virus"... I could be wrong.
Reply:Well bactiria doesn't have a nucleus and a virus does so I think a virus is more serious than bacteria.
Reply:They both cause sickness.
Reply:They are both microscopic and can be harmful to the body
In bacteria cells, how are proteins made? and what do proteasomes do to break down these proteins?
Proteins are made just as they are in eukaryotes via the process known as translation. The ribosomes are slightly different (70S in prokaryotes versus 80S in eukaryoties) but they're still made up of rRNA and protein subunits. In eukaryotes, transcription (DNA ---%26gt; RNA) and translation are temporally and spatially separated by the nuclear membrane. In prokaryotes, however, there is no such separation as there is no nuclear membrane. That is transcription and translation can occur at the same time. I'm not sure how protein degradation works in prokaryotes - but i know in eukaryotes, proteins to be degraded are ubquitinated and this targets them for degradation by the proteasome. That's as much as i can offer
Will bacteria form in bottled water if chilled then left out to warmthen rechilled? Say from sitting in a car?
The seal is never broken on the bottle?
Will bacteria form in bottled water if chilled then left out to warmthen rechilled? Say from sitting in a car?
i think that if its not open then its okay but i tink the only way that bacterial will form is everytime u take a drink out of it with ur mouth.
Reply:The fact that it's sealed makes all the difference. It's basically sterile. So it should be fine to drink.
Reply:The only way bacterial growth will occur is if the seal is broken and bacteria is introduced (by drinking from the bottle). Even if the seal has been broken, if nothing has had contact with the water in the bottle (lips, fingers), no bacterial growth will occur.
Reply:NO.
Bacteria does not mysteriously appear.
If bacteria was in the bottle (never opened) in the first place then only a slight problem exists (vary rare). It depends on the cell count to be sure of any health concern and for this a lab would be helpful.
Bacteria need a certain temp. (strains vary on this), a food source, and water in order to reproduce. Well there is plenty of water but no food in your water bottle. It is safe. If you have opened it and subjected to these extremes of temp. still your biggest concern is quality not health. Molds would then be your concern. Just a flavor thing.
Drink up %26amp; enjoy.
Will bacteria form in bottled water if chilled then left out to warmthen rechilled? Say from sitting in a car?
i think that if its not open then its okay but i tink the only way that bacterial will form is everytime u take a drink out of it with ur mouth.
Reply:The fact that it's sealed makes all the difference. It's basically sterile. So it should be fine to drink.
Reply:The only way bacterial growth will occur is if the seal is broken and bacteria is introduced (by drinking from the bottle). Even if the seal has been broken, if nothing has had contact with the water in the bottle (lips, fingers), no bacterial growth will occur.
Reply:NO.
Bacteria does not mysteriously appear.
If bacteria was in the bottle (never opened) in the first place then only a slight problem exists (vary rare). It depends on the cell count to be sure of any health concern and for this a lab would be helpful.
Bacteria need a certain temp. (strains vary on this), a food source, and water in order to reproduce. Well there is plenty of water but no food in your water bottle. It is safe. If you have opened it and subjected to these extremes of temp. still your biggest concern is quality not health. Molds would then be your concern. Just a flavor thing.
Drink up %26amp; enjoy.
How to eliminate gram positive bacteria from a mixture of gram-negative bacteria?
Gram (-) bacteria are resitant to things that Gram positive aren't.
You could eliminate g+ bacteria one of two ways from a culture of both of these types of bacteria.
Gram positive are suceptible to pencilin like antibiotics. Infusing those antibiotics into a culture with both of these bacteria will degrade the cell walls of the gram positive bacteria. They will not affect the gram negative bacteria.
Secondly, gram positive bacteria need specific amino acids and nutrients that gram negative bacteria can synthesize on their own. By creating a specific culture medium, one can kill off the gram positive bacteria.
How to eliminate gram positive bacteria from a mixture of gram-negative bacteria?
any kind of penicillin will do it. Other antibiotics can be effective against gram -, so check before.....
camellia
You could eliminate g+ bacteria one of two ways from a culture of both of these types of bacteria.
Gram positive are suceptible to pencilin like antibiotics. Infusing those antibiotics into a culture with both of these bacteria will degrade the cell walls of the gram positive bacteria. They will not affect the gram negative bacteria.
Secondly, gram positive bacteria need specific amino acids and nutrients that gram negative bacteria can synthesize on their own. By creating a specific culture medium, one can kill off the gram positive bacteria.
How to eliminate gram positive bacteria from a mixture of gram-negative bacteria?
any kind of penicillin will do it. Other antibiotics can be effective against gram -, so check before.....
camellia
Among bacteria, protist, fungi, and plant, which one has the largest cell size?
Please list them in order.
Is there a relationship between number of cell types and genome size?
Among bacteria, protist, fungi, and plant, which one has the largest cell size?
protists, fungi, plant, bacteria (in order). more cell types, more genes contain the genome.
Is there a relationship between number of cell types and genome size?
Among bacteria, protist, fungi, and plant, which one has the largest cell size?
protists, fungi, plant, bacteria (in order). more cell types, more genes contain the genome.
How bacteria makes a person sick?
Bacteria can make a person sick. But alot of problems come from bacteria that have been destroyed and can't protect us from the harmful bacteria. For instance yeast infections are almost always caused by a lack of the normal flora of bacteria. 60% of all you vitamin K that is used for blood clotting comes from bacteria in your gut. But the three main ways that they cause you to get sick is.
1. The natural flora is destroyed and a "bad" bacteria or yeast can flourish. If this happens then it goes to step 2.
2. The bacteria when it eats nutrients in your blood or body it produces toxins as a byproduct.
3. Or it can actually attack certain cells in your body and can cause harm that way.
Something that is common in older people is that they come in with an infection and the Dr. prescribes a powerful antibiotic called Rocephin. This wipes out the normal flora of the intestines and the person comes down with Clostridium Diff. They then prescribe a more powerful antibiotic called Vancomyacin. This seems to quell the C. Diff. but then they get yeast infections because there is no bacteria to protect them. The bacteria eventually develope a resistant strain called VRE to help combat the void left in the intestine and by this time the person is usually very ill because of the yeast infections and C. Diff. They then develope a Urinary Tract infection by the VRE and develope sepsis and then die.
How bacteria makes a person sick?
Well, there are many ways in which bacteria can make a person sick. But mainly there are two ways in which the operate:
1. Interfering with normal metabolism of the cell
2. Producing toxins which can harm the cell
The bacteria which cause disease are called pathogens and they live in/on our cells where they complete there life cycle.
1. The natural flora is destroyed and a "bad" bacteria or yeast can flourish. If this happens then it goes to step 2.
2. The bacteria when it eats nutrients in your blood or body it produces toxins as a byproduct.
3. Or it can actually attack certain cells in your body and can cause harm that way.
Something that is common in older people is that they come in with an infection and the Dr. prescribes a powerful antibiotic called Rocephin. This wipes out the normal flora of the intestines and the person comes down with Clostridium Diff. They then prescribe a more powerful antibiotic called Vancomyacin. This seems to quell the C. Diff. but then they get yeast infections because there is no bacteria to protect them. The bacteria eventually develope a resistant strain called VRE to help combat the void left in the intestine and by this time the person is usually very ill because of the yeast infections and C. Diff. They then develope a Urinary Tract infection by the VRE and develope sepsis and then die.
How bacteria makes a person sick?
Well, there are many ways in which bacteria can make a person sick. But mainly there are two ways in which the operate:
1. Interfering with normal metabolism of the cell
2. Producing toxins which can harm the cell
The bacteria which cause disease are called pathogens and they live in/on our cells where they complete there life cycle.
Aerobic bacteria need:?
A. Water
B. land
c. Oxygen
d.light
Aerobic bacteria need:?
c. Oxygen
Reply:C. Oxygen :]
.. and futhermore, anaerobic bacteria do not need oxygen..
Reply:oxygen-C
Reply:A. Water and
C. Oxygen
Reply:Every living thing needs water. This should not be in your list.
Reply:oxygen
B. land
c. Oxygen
d.light
Aerobic bacteria need:?
c. Oxygen
Reply:C. Oxygen :]
.. and futhermore, anaerobic bacteria do not need oxygen..
Reply:oxygen-C
Reply:A. Water and
C. Oxygen
Reply:Every living thing needs water. This should not be in your list.
Reply:oxygen
Is bacteria more harmful than virus?
Some bacteria are beneficial to mankind, whereas I have yet to hear about a useful virsus.
Is bacteria more harmful than virus?
no.. i think virus is ..because there is no cure yet..
Reply:No. It depends on the type of bacteria or virus as to how harmful it is, there are types of both that can kill you and there are also examples of both that don't do much at all. Most bacteria though can be treated with antibiotics, a virus cannot be treated like this.
Reply:Viruses multiply faster than bacteria.They are cellular parasites.They are inert unless they have entered the host cell.
Bacteria are decmoposers and in that sense useful.Many are beneficial in that they fix nitrogen, manufacture vitamins, make milk into curd and so on.You can use bacteria to manufacture useful molecules like insulin by using the techniques of biotechnology.But there are bacteria causing disease like tuberculosis, typhoid etc.
Reply:On the contrary. Viruses or pathigens are more harmful then bacteria. Bacteria remains in our body,in every single corner of the world but yet does hardly any damage; even some of the bacteria are essential for us(Making Curd out of milk, releasing nitrogen from our body,decomposing bio-degradable stuff and helps in making our bonnes strong as well.).these stuff u can not expect from a virus as being a pathogen they tend to mutate and multiply based on the source organism
Reply:It can be, depending on what type of bacteria. On the other hand, it depends on which virus you're talking about. Either can be beneficial, or even deadly.
Reply:depends what kind of bacteria. There are no beneficial viruses, but there are beneficial bacteria, however.
Reply:Bacteria is a kind of organism, which can be defeated by organism. Virus is a genetic mutating agent, which cannot be defeated by organism. So, a virus is more dangerous than bacteria because it changes its genetic code(DNA) every time it invades a cell.
Reply:no virus are much more harmful than the former .viruses have the tendency to make copies of themselves using the DNA of the host and also manipulating it, where as they r non living things outside the host so it is difficult to study them. also there r many hybrids of viruses still unknown to the biologists but they estimate that they would manymore times harmful than the usual as they r the hybrids.the imp. point is they spread from one host to another much faster than bacteria eg: SARS, BIRDFLU etc. also many bacteria r useful like bacillus etc, but till now no virus is considered useful to humanbeings.
Reply:both are equally harmful. For example some species of gram positive and gram negative stephalococci can cause septicemia or septic shop.
Even virus such as hepatic virus can lead to hepatic coma
Reply:the ability of a pathogen (either bacteria or virus) to cause an infection depends on a factor called virulence.
Virulence is either the relative pathogenicity or the relative ability to do damage to the host of an infectious agent. The term is used mainly for viruses, but it can be more generally applied to parasites or bacteria.
Please read more on virulence at Wikipedia
Reply:neither! Human beings are!!
Reply:some bacerias are very useful to us and no virus is useful to us
thus you can imagine which is more harmful
Reply:equal
Reply:i think viruses r really deadly.there r no cure for it.but from bacteria ah so much help.but i don't say that they r not harmful.they too r harmful but not as virus
Reply:HI FRIEND! THE ANSWER IS NO.A BEST EXAMPLE WHICH CAN PROOF THIS AND WHICH CAN ALSO PROOF HOW VIRUS IS HELPFULL TO US i.e 2 in 1 example:-
A VIRUS NAMED "BACTERIOPHAGE" FOUND IN RIVER GANGA(THE REASON BEHIND PURITY OF WATER OF GANGA) WHICH KILL HARMFULL BACTERIA.
BUT THEIR IS NO BACTERIA KNOWN WHICH CAN KILL VIRUS!.but their r many bacteria WHICH IS USEFULL TO MANKIND!
Reply:The more harmful (to humans) is a bacteria, Clostridium botulinum. It produces botulin toxin, an extraordinarily poisonous substance that is lethal at a dosage of a mere 300pg/kg.
You did not ask about the benefits of viral and bacterial interaction with host organisms, but I will comment on the topic in the possibility that it is of interest. Bacteria, viruses and retroviruses offer benefits, including protection through adaptation of systems to fend of various attacks produced by other viruses, retroviruses and by bacteria.
Reply:no
lady slipper
Is bacteria more harmful than virus?
no.. i think virus is ..because there is no cure yet..
Reply:No. It depends on the type of bacteria or virus as to how harmful it is, there are types of both that can kill you and there are also examples of both that don't do much at all. Most bacteria though can be treated with antibiotics, a virus cannot be treated like this.
Reply:Viruses multiply faster than bacteria.They are cellular parasites.They are inert unless they have entered the host cell.
Bacteria are decmoposers and in that sense useful.Many are beneficial in that they fix nitrogen, manufacture vitamins, make milk into curd and so on.You can use bacteria to manufacture useful molecules like insulin by using the techniques of biotechnology.But there are bacteria causing disease like tuberculosis, typhoid etc.
Reply:On the contrary. Viruses or pathigens are more harmful then bacteria. Bacteria remains in our body,in every single corner of the world but yet does hardly any damage; even some of the bacteria are essential for us(Making Curd out of milk, releasing nitrogen from our body,decomposing bio-degradable stuff and helps in making our bonnes strong as well.).these stuff u can not expect from a virus as being a pathogen they tend to mutate and multiply based on the source organism
Reply:It can be, depending on what type of bacteria. On the other hand, it depends on which virus you're talking about. Either can be beneficial, or even deadly.
Reply:depends what kind of bacteria. There are no beneficial viruses, but there are beneficial bacteria, however.
Reply:Bacteria is a kind of organism, which can be defeated by organism. Virus is a genetic mutating agent, which cannot be defeated by organism. So, a virus is more dangerous than bacteria because it changes its genetic code(DNA) every time it invades a cell.
Reply:no virus are much more harmful than the former .viruses have the tendency to make copies of themselves using the DNA of the host and also manipulating it, where as they r non living things outside the host so it is difficult to study them. also there r many hybrids of viruses still unknown to the biologists but they estimate that they would manymore times harmful than the usual as they r the hybrids.the imp. point is they spread from one host to another much faster than bacteria eg: SARS, BIRDFLU etc. also many bacteria r useful like bacillus etc, but till now no virus is considered useful to humanbeings.
Reply:both are equally harmful. For example some species of gram positive and gram negative stephalococci can cause septicemia or septic shop.
Even virus such as hepatic virus can lead to hepatic coma
Reply:the ability of a pathogen (either bacteria or virus) to cause an infection depends on a factor called virulence.
Virulence is either the relative pathogenicity or the relative ability to do damage to the host of an infectious agent. The term is used mainly for viruses, but it can be more generally applied to parasites or bacteria.
Please read more on virulence at Wikipedia
Reply:neither! Human beings are!!
Reply:some bacerias are very useful to us and no virus is useful to us
thus you can imagine which is more harmful
Reply:equal
Reply:i think viruses r really deadly.there r no cure for it.but from bacteria ah so much help.but i don't say that they r not harmful.they too r harmful but not as virus
Reply:HI FRIEND! THE ANSWER IS NO.A BEST EXAMPLE WHICH CAN PROOF THIS AND WHICH CAN ALSO PROOF HOW VIRUS IS HELPFULL TO US i.e 2 in 1 example:-
A VIRUS NAMED "BACTERIOPHAGE" FOUND IN RIVER GANGA(THE REASON BEHIND PURITY OF WATER OF GANGA) WHICH KILL HARMFULL BACTERIA.
BUT THEIR IS NO BACTERIA KNOWN WHICH CAN KILL VIRUS!.but their r many bacteria WHICH IS USEFULL TO MANKIND!
Reply:The more harmful (to humans) is a bacteria, Clostridium botulinum. It produces botulin toxin, an extraordinarily poisonous substance that is lethal at a dosage of a mere 300pg/kg.
You did not ask about the benefits of viral and bacterial interaction with host organisms, but I will comment on the topic in the possibility that it is of interest. Bacteria, viruses and retroviruses offer benefits, including protection through adaptation of systems to fend of various attacks produced by other viruses, retroviruses and by bacteria.
Reply:no
lady slipper
Wat bacteria makes you throw up after drinking milk?
Throwupazoidals
Wat bacteria makes you throw up after drinking milk?
I don't throw up after drinking milk, but I'll check.
Escherichia coli
Streptococcus lactis
Reply:maybe you are lactose intolerant. if this is the case, you have problems with milk, yogurt, cheese, ect.
Reply:A sour bacteria
Reply:I dont know of a bacteria in milk that would make you throw-up,maybe if it was spoiled? It may be that you are lactose intolerant. Check out the site below for more information
Reply:You are probably lactose intolerant.
Reply:I DONT THROW UP
Wat bacteria makes you throw up after drinking milk?
I don't throw up after drinking milk, but I'll check.
Escherichia coli
Streptococcus lactis
Reply:maybe you are lactose intolerant. if this is the case, you have problems with milk, yogurt, cheese, ect.
Reply:A sour bacteria
Reply:I dont know of a bacteria in milk that would make you throw-up,maybe if it was spoiled? It may be that you are lactose intolerant. Check out the site below for more information
Reply:You are probably lactose intolerant.
Reply:I DONT THROW UP
What bacteria are located in the saliva of a Komodo Dragon?
There are over 50 different types of bacteria in Komodo saliva. Here is an excerpt on the most common:
"While Escherichia coli was the most common bacterium isolated from the saliva of wild dragons, this species was not present in captive dragons. The most common bacteria isolated from the saliva of captive dragons were Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus caseolyticus, neither of which were found in wild dragons."
Here's the link... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query...
What bacteria are located in the saliva of a Komodo Dragon?
You should direct this question towards the zoo experts that can give you a proper answer - personally I'd run a mile PDQ if one of them were to come anywhere near me!
Reply:I think a question with a shorter answer would be "What bacteria AREN'T in a Komodo's saliva."
"While Escherichia coli was the most common bacterium isolated from the saliva of wild dragons, this species was not present in captive dragons. The most common bacteria isolated from the saliva of captive dragons were Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus caseolyticus, neither of which were found in wild dragons."
Here's the link... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query...
What bacteria are located in the saliva of a Komodo Dragon?
You should direct this question towards the zoo experts that can give you a proper answer - personally I'd run a mile PDQ if one of them were to come anywhere near me!
Reply:I think a question with a shorter answer would be "What bacteria AREN'T in a Komodo's saliva."
Mengilicopal bacteria, where can I find information on it? (sorry, I may have spelt it wrong)?
Meningococcal Bacteria:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseasein...
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseasein...
Does bacteria have more culture than some people??
LOL... I luv puns...
My coworkers hate them though so I am socially outcast :(
Does bacteria have more culture than some people??
oh yes i do belive so
Reply:Yes, undoubtedly so.
Reply:It does seem that way.
Reply:reminds me of a joke i heard:
what's the difference between australians and bacteria?
If you leave bacteria for 200 years it forms a culture!
Reply:And better grammar.
Reply:Yes.
Reply:yes meeting some of the people i meet it probably smells better too
Reply:he he he
Reply:Ive even heard that it will call you the next day
Reply:in soome cases that would not b hard so proberly yes
Reply:Lol, most definitely
Reply:LOL great question.....YES
Reply:Looks that way.
Reply:Yup, I worked at a facory where the individual IQ was in low double digits, %26amp; the collective IQ wasn't much higher...
%26amp; they all acted like the all voted for Bush too...scary...
Reply:Can you honestly say that a "Chav" has culture?
Reply:Yes, I guess so!
dendrobium
My coworkers hate them though so I am socially outcast :(
Does bacteria have more culture than some people??
oh yes i do belive so
Reply:Yes, undoubtedly so.
Reply:It does seem that way.
Reply:reminds me of a joke i heard:
what's the difference between australians and bacteria?
If you leave bacteria for 200 years it forms a culture!
Reply:And better grammar.
Reply:Yes.
Reply:yes meeting some of the people i meet it probably smells better too
Reply:he he he
Reply:Ive even heard that it will call you the next day
Reply:in soome cases that would not b hard so proberly yes
Reply:Lol, most definitely
Reply:LOL great question.....YES
Reply:Looks that way.
Reply:Yup, I worked at a facory where the individual IQ was in low double digits, %26amp; the collective IQ wasn't much higher...
%26amp; they all acted like the all voted for Bush too...scary...
Reply:Can you honestly say that a "Chav" has culture?
Reply:Yes, I guess so!
dendrobium
Which bacteria is most frequently found on contact lenses??
~i wear contacts.
Which bacteria is most frequently found on contact lenses??
Probably the most common bacteria found in and around the eyes is staphylococcus.
Which bacteria is most frequently found on contact lenses??
Probably the most common bacteria found in and around the eyes is staphylococcus.
Is bacteria.....?
the only culture you have?
Is bacteria.....?
no - and that's the yeast I can tell you!
Reply:youre a retard
Reply:Oh no I have more culture than just that.....lol
Reply:ha ha good one......I think it would be a big fat YES for many folks here
Reply:no
Reply:Hey you copied that off my 360 page!
Reply:Thank you for today's first belly laugh! Now my customers are all looking at me like I am some sort of lunatic. Guess the answer here for the moment must be yes.
Reply:... weirdo
Reply:That is funny! HAHA!
Is bacteria.....?
no - and that's the yeast I can tell you!
Reply:youre a retard
Reply:Oh no I have more culture than just that.....lol
Reply:ha ha good one......I think it would be a big fat YES for many folks here
Reply:no
Reply:Hey you copied that off my 360 page!
Reply:Thank you for today's first belly laugh! Now my customers are all looking at me like I am some sort of lunatic. Guess the answer here for the moment must be yes.
Reply:... weirdo
Reply:That is funny! HAHA!
Is bacteria a producer?
Yes, most bacteria are producers. In biology, bacteria are called "autotrophs", like plants. The other group are called "heterotrophs", and they are you consumers, like you and me and my cat over here.
Some bacteria, though, are also what you would call "recyclers". I forgot the biological term for recyclers. Some bacteria, on the other hand, feed on other bacteria, so asides from being like plants, they are also like animals, which are heterotrophs.
Is bacteria a producer?
It depends with respect to what prospective u r thinking of, in general they are considered consumers but yes there r some bacteria which can do photosynthesis but they most common ones those help plants fixing N2.
Reply:a producer is an organism that can synthesise its own food. if the said bacteria can synthesise its own food, then yes, it ia a producer.
Reply:no
Reply:Most bacteria are not producers, they are consumers. Most bacteria are decomposers, though some are parasites.
The bacteria that are called cyanobacteria are producers that use photosynthesis. There are also some bacteria that live near deep sea volcanic vents and produce their own food using chemicals for energy. These bacteria are producers that use chemosynthesis.
Some bacteria, though, are also what you would call "recyclers". I forgot the biological term for recyclers. Some bacteria, on the other hand, feed on other bacteria, so asides from being like plants, they are also like animals, which are heterotrophs.
Is bacteria a producer?
It depends with respect to what prospective u r thinking of, in general they are considered consumers but yes there r some bacteria which can do photosynthesis but they most common ones those help plants fixing N2.
Reply:a producer is an organism that can synthesise its own food. if the said bacteria can synthesise its own food, then yes, it ia a producer.
Reply:no
Reply:Most bacteria are not producers, they are consumers. Most bacteria are decomposers, though some are parasites.
The bacteria that are called cyanobacteria are producers that use photosynthesis. There are also some bacteria that live near deep sea volcanic vents and produce their own food using chemicals for energy. These bacteria are producers that use chemosynthesis.
Does Bacteria dies in the fridge/ freezer, In the freezer?
from the cold Air.
Does Bacteria dies in the fridge/ freezer, In the freezer?
No. Cold temperatures do not kill bacteria - they simply slow bacterial growth. Yes, they will "wake up" when they get warm.
Reply:NO they will simply slow down but not be killed.
Reply:No, it grows in the refrig. and holds in the freezer.
Reply:haha..no..it grows in there
Reply:Heat kills bacteria! As far as I know, cold does not
Reply:the only thing that kills it is heat. and not every type of bacteria.
Reply:i'm in high school and i'm taking a culinary arts class. We learned that Freezing stuff does not kill bacteria but it simply slows the growth of bacteria
:]
Reply:no its not cold enough to do that
broadleaf
Does Bacteria dies in the fridge/ freezer, In the freezer?
No. Cold temperatures do not kill bacteria - they simply slow bacterial growth. Yes, they will "wake up" when they get warm.
Reply:NO they will simply slow down but not be killed.
Reply:No, it grows in the refrig. and holds in the freezer.
Reply:haha..no..it grows in there
Reply:Heat kills bacteria! As far as I know, cold does not
Reply:the only thing that kills it is heat. and not every type of bacteria.
Reply:i'm in high school and i'm taking a culinary arts class. We learned that Freezing stuff does not kill bacteria but it simply slows the growth of bacteria
:]
Reply:no its not cold enough to do that
broadleaf
Cyan & bacteria?
other term for cyano bacteria is "blue-green algae". it is called so because from the word "CYAN" meaning greenish-blue colour and they are classified as bacteria. Cyanobacteria contain the same kind of chlorophyll that is found in green plants, but it is distributed throughout the cell rather than confined in chloroplasts. Other pigments mask the chlorophyll in many species and impart a bluish or sometimes reddish colour.
Cyan %26amp; bacteria?
Do you mean...
cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria are aquatic and photosynthetic, that is, they live in the water, and can manufacture their own food. Because they are bacteria, they are quite small and usually unicellular, though they often grow in colonies large enough to see. They have the distinction of being the oldest known fossils, more than 3.5 billion years old, in fact! It may surprise you then to know that the cyanobacteria are still around; they are one of the largest and most important groups of bacteria on earth.
Cyan %26amp; bacteria?
Do you mean...
cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria are aquatic and photosynthetic, that is, they live in the water, and can manufacture their own food. Because they are bacteria, they are quite small and usually unicellular, though they often grow in colonies large enough to see. They have the distinction of being the oldest known fossils, more than 3.5 billion years old, in fact! It may surprise you then to know that the cyanobacteria are still around; they are one of the largest and most important groups of bacteria on earth.
Can bacteria travel through space?
Bacteria can definitely travel through space. Whether it will be intact after it hits a planet is the question. No bacteria currently on record could escape Earth's atmosphere on its own, but that isn't to say that a hearty spaceborne bacteria couldn't hitch a ride on a meteor impacting the Earth's surface. It is entirely possible we will see bacteria from space in our lifetimes. Of course, that bacteria will probably be defunct as if it survives in a vacuum. Any bacteria of this type would be anaerobic (without oxygen) and the introduction to our atmosphere would kill it. That is, unless there is a third type of bactera that can be both aerobic (survives in atmosphere) and anaerobic (survives with no atmosphere)
I would assume that some scientist in some country has thought to take bacteria samples to space to study the effects of a zero-g environment. In that sense, bacteria can travel through space, they just need a little help from a friendly researcher.
Can bacteria travel through space?
no, they can't survive
Reply:It is possible.
Reply:sure why not
Reply:Possibly inside of a meteorite, they think viruses can.
Reply:I guess its possible
Reply:no they cannot survive the vacuum
Reply:No they cannot because bacteria need oxygen to live like all living things but there are no oxygen in space so that's why astronauts bring oxygen tanks when they travel into space
Reply:It depends on the type of organism.If it is an anaerobic bacterium then it will definitely find it easier to travel through intersteller spaces.Some bacteria can survive at temperatures of 121 degrees and an acidic environment of 1-2pH also.Others are able to live on at temperatures as low as-20 degrees.
Reply:It can...and it has already. Look it up.
Reply:Yes they can travel as well as survive. see details:
On April 20, 1967, the unmanned lunar lander Surveyor 3 landed near Oceanus Procellarum on the surface of the moon. One of the things aboard was a television camera. Two-and-a-half years later, on November 20, 1969, Apollo 12 astronauts Pete Conrad and Alan L. Bean recovered the camera. When NASA scientists examined it back on Earth they were surprised to find specimens of Streptococcus mitis that were still alive. Because of the precautions the astronauts had taken, NASA could be sure that the germs were inside the camera when it was retrieved, so they must have been there before the Surveyor 3 was launched. These bacteria had survived for 31 months in the vacuum of the moon's atmosphere. Perhaps NASA shouldn't have been surprised, because there are other bacteria that thrive under near-vacuum pressure on the earth today. Anyway, we now know that the vacuum of space is not a fatal problem for bacteria.
What about the low temperature and the possible lack of liquid water in space? The bacteria that survived on the moon suffered huge monthly temperature swings and the complete lack of water. Freezing and drying, in the presence of the right protectants, are actually two ways normal bacteria can enter a state of suspended animation. And interestingly, if the right protectants aren't supplied originally, the bacteria that die first supply them for the benefit of the surviving ones!
VR
Reply:Yes, some satellites have been found to have had bacteria on the outside of them when their payloads were recovered by NASA. It is thought they went into a "suspended hibernation" type state and when returned to the heat and air came "back to life". Sort of like microbial life found in the permafrost near the polar regions. Take a chunk of permafrost ice, melt it and the microbes inside start moving again.
Reply:Some scientists believe that life on earth began with microbes that could have "hitched a lift" on a comet.
Reply:Bacteria have been found on the lense of one of the cameras tkaen to the moon during the apollo missions; so yes, they can travel through space
Reply:Free-floating bacteria anywhere near the sun (in earth's orbit?) would likely be killed by the sun's radiation, especially a full dose of ultraviolet light. Certain bacteria that need water molecules in their structure would likely dry up in the vacuum of space. Thus, bacterial escaping from earth would likely perish if not protected. This would also likely apply to bacteria arriving from outer space. The sun is a great sterilizing machine (capable of turning human skin red even on an overcast day!).
Reply:NO, they can't survive....they need appropraite enviorment to survive. Can u survive under water or without oxygen? your answer will be NO...in the same way bacteria need appropriate enviorment to survive.
Reply:It seems very possible although the evidence so far coming from man made objects (space probes, etc) has generally been debunked. As far as I am aware (that means I'm likely as not to be wrong here) nobody has ever performed a controlled experiment showing survival of bacteria entering earths atmosphere.
It isn't just bacteria likely to survive the cold and vaccuum though. There was a great experiment with a tardigrade in a scanning electronmicroscope. They evacuated the chamber, took loads of pictures and after opening up the chamber the little champion got up and walked off - thats tough!!
I would assume that some scientist in some country has thought to take bacteria samples to space to study the effects of a zero-g environment. In that sense, bacteria can travel through space, they just need a little help from a friendly researcher.
Can bacteria travel through space?
no, they can't survive
Reply:It is possible.
Reply:sure why not
Reply:Possibly inside of a meteorite, they think viruses can.
Reply:I guess its possible
Reply:no they cannot survive the vacuum
Reply:No they cannot because bacteria need oxygen to live like all living things but there are no oxygen in space so that's why astronauts bring oxygen tanks when they travel into space
Reply:It depends on the type of organism.If it is an anaerobic bacterium then it will definitely find it easier to travel through intersteller spaces.Some bacteria can survive at temperatures of 121 degrees and an acidic environment of 1-2pH also.Others are able to live on at temperatures as low as-20 degrees.
Reply:It can...and it has already. Look it up.
Reply:Yes they can travel as well as survive. see details:
On April 20, 1967, the unmanned lunar lander Surveyor 3 landed near Oceanus Procellarum on the surface of the moon. One of the things aboard was a television camera. Two-and-a-half years later, on November 20, 1969, Apollo 12 astronauts Pete Conrad and Alan L. Bean recovered the camera. When NASA scientists examined it back on Earth they were surprised to find specimens of Streptococcus mitis that were still alive. Because of the precautions the astronauts had taken, NASA could be sure that the germs were inside the camera when it was retrieved, so they must have been there before the Surveyor 3 was launched. These bacteria had survived for 31 months in the vacuum of the moon's atmosphere. Perhaps NASA shouldn't have been surprised, because there are other bacteria that thrive under near-vacuum pressure on the earth today. Anyway, we now know that the vacuum of space is not a fatal problem for bacteria.
What about the low temperature and the possible lack of liquid water in space? The bacteria that survived on the moon suffered huge monthly temperature swings and the complete lack of water. Freezing and drying, in the presence of the right protectants, are actually two ways normal bacteria can enter a state of suspended animation. And interestingly, if the right protectants aren't supplied originally, the bacteria that die first supply them for the benefit of the surviving ones!
VR
Reply:Yes, some satellites have been found to have had bacteria on the outside of them when their payloads were recovered by NASA. It is thought they went into a "suspended hibernation" type state and when returned to the heat and air came "back to life". Sort of like microbial life found in the permafrost near the polar regions. Take a chunk of permafrost ice, melt it and the microbes inside start moving again.
Reply:Some scientists believe that life on earth began with microbes that could have "hitched a lift" on a comet.
Reply:Bacteria have been found on the lense of one of the cameras tkaen to the moon during the apollo missions; so yes, they can travel through space
Reply:Free-floating bacteria anywhere near the sun (in earth's orbit?) would likely be killed by the sun's radiation, especially a full dose of ultraviolet light. Certain bacteria that need water molecules in their structure would likely dry up in the vacuum of space. Thus, bacterial escaping from earth would likely perish if not protected. This would also likely apply to bacteria arriving from outer space. The sun is a great sterilizing machine (capable of turning human skin red even on an overcast day!).
Reply:NO, they can't survive....they need appropraite enviorment to survive. Can u survive under water or without oxygen? your answer will be NO...in the same way bacteria need appropriate enviorment to survive.
Reply:It seems very possible although the evidence so far coming from man made objects (space probes, etc) has generally been debunked. As far as I am aware (that means I'm likely as not to be wrong here) nobody has ever performed a controlled experiment showing survival of bacteria entering earths atmosphere.
It isn't just bacteria likely to survive the cold and vaccuum though. There was a great experiment with a tardigrade in a scanning electronmicroscope. They evacuated the chamber, took loads of pictures and after opening up the chamber the little champion got up and walked off - thats tough!!
Which bacteria r deadly to humans?
from where do they come from
Which bacteria r deadly to humans?
botulism is about as deadly as you get.
edit. the toxin created by botulism is one of the most powerful toxins known to man. Mostly comes from food poisoning. (Wiki)
But with more resistant baceria becoming prevelent who knows. Luckily most bacteria can be taken care of with antibiotics nowadays, but that could change to where most strains of bacteria have become resistant to drugs to to overuse of antibiotics.
Reply:Any bacteria is deadly to humans it just depends on how strong your imune system is.
Reply:Bacterium are everywhere. There are so many types it is impossible to mention on here. Some are good for us and some are bad for us. If I were you I wouldn't worry about it, knowledge can be a bad thing, lol.
Antibacterial soaps kill the good stuff, and they themselves (for that reason) can make us sick.
Which bacteria r deadly to humans?
botulism is about as deadly as you get.
edit. the toxin created by botulism is one of the most powerful toxins known to man. Mostly comes from food poisoning. (Wiki)
But with more resistant baceria becoming prevelent who knows. Luckily most bacteria can be taken care of with antibiotics nowadays, but that could change to where most strains of bacteria have become resistant to drugs to to overuse of antibiotics.
Reply:Any bacteria is deadly to humans it just depends on how strong your imune system is.
Reply:Bacterium are everywhere. There are so many types it is impossible to mention on here. Some are good for us and some are bad for us. If I were you I wouldn't worry about it, knowledge can be a bad thing, lol.
Antibacterial soaps kill the good stuff, and they themselves (for that reason) can make us sick.
Why food that has had bacteria growing on it can cause food poisoning even when the bacteria have been killed?
killed by cooking
Why food that has had bacteria growing on it can cause food poisoning even when the bacteria have been killed?
You can become intoxicated as in the case of Clostridium botulinum (botulism) or Staphylococcus aureus (caused by Staph. Super Antigens).
I am going to add, however, that those toxins are generally destroyed by cooking. But the theoretical answer to you question is definitely because the bacteria have secreted toxins which make you ill upon consumption.
Reply:who said that?
Cooking is to kill bacteria. Unless you mean like parasites etc. Not cooking well or thoroughly enough doesn't kill them (or kill them all) which causes food poisoning
Reply:Because the bacteria produce toxins as waste products in their growth. Heat can kill the bacteria but won't destroy the toxins. Botulism is a good example of this.
Reply:Bacteria secretes toxins that might survive cooking that kills the bacteria itself.
Reply:if the food has been cooked, then set on a contaminated surface-welcome to the world of food poisoning!! also if it is not cooked thouroughly some bacteria and parasites will form endospores that keep them protected until things are safe again. also, when people handle your cooked food after taking a bit **** and not washing their hands, that can make you sick as well.
night jasmine
Why food that has had bacteria growing on it can cause food poisoning even when the bacteria have been killed?
You can become intoxicated as in the case of Clostridium botulinum (botulism) or Staphylococcus aureus (caused by Staph. Super Antigens).
I am going to add, however, that those toxins are generally destroyed by cooking. But the theoretical answer to you question is definitely because the bacteria have secreted toxins which make you ill upon consumption.
Reply:who said that?
Cooking is to kill bacteria. Unless you mean like parasites etc. Not cooking well or thoroughly enough doesn't kill them (or kill them all) which causes food poisoning
Reply:Because the bacteria produce toxins as waste products in their growth. Heat can kill the bacteria but won't destroy the toxins. Botulism is a good example of this.
Reply:Bacteria secretes toxins that might survive cooking that kills the bacteria itself.
Reply:if the food has been cooked, then set on a contaminated surface-welcome to the world of food poisoning!! also if it is not cooked thouroughly some bacteria and parasites will form endospores that keep them protected until things are safe again. also, when people handle your cooked food after taking a bit **** and not washing their hands, that can make you sick as well.
night jasmine
What bacteria can cause diare?
E. coli, cholera, salmonella, shigella, campylobacter, yersinnia, aeromonas etc.
What bacteria can cause diare?
Salmonella
Reply:yes, it can.
Reply:You mean diarrhea? Lots of bacteria can cause that.
Reply:E coli...the coccus strand of bacteria, is, I believe most responsible for diarrhea.
Reply:Clostridium difficile toxin,otherwise known as c-diff
Reply:ecolie, simonila, that's just a couple. there are over 500 that can cause digestive system problems, but those two are the most common.
What bacteria can cause diare?
Salmonella
Reply:yes, it can.
Reply:You mean diarrhea? Lots of bacteria can cause that.
Reply:E coli...the coccus strand of bacteria, is, I believe most responsible for diarrhea.
Reply:Clostridium difficile toxin,otherwise known as c-diff
Reply:ecolie, simonila, that's just a couple. there are over 500 that can cause digestive system problems, but those two are the most common.
Could bacteria grow on the streak plate and not be seen using the pour plate technique?
If the bacteria was extremely sensitive to low oxygen, then it might not grow in pour plates because of the slightly reduced levels as you go deeper in the agar.
Could bacteria grow on the streak plate and not be seen using the pour plate technique?
I eat steak wunst in a great while. And I always eat it off a clean plate. I pour BarbieQ sauce on it. The plate gets sauce stains on it, of course.
Reply:YES
Reply:Obligate anarobes do not grow well in pour plate techniques. There is one reason.
Could bacteria grow on the streak plate and not be seen using the pour plate technique?
I eat steak wunst in a great while. And I always eat it off a clean plate. I pour BarbieQ sauce on it. The plate gets sauce stains on it, of course.
Reply:YES
Reply:Obligate anarobes do not grow well in pour plate techniques. There is one reason.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Do bacteria require oxygen for growth?
plsssssssssss help me!!!!!!
Do bacteria require oxygen for growth?
yes ofcourse they require oxygen for respiration if they are aerobic bacteria. oxygen helps in respiration to break sugars down to release energy used in cell mechanisms and growth.
this releases CO2.
however, there are anaerbic bacteria that dont require oxygen, but they require CO2.
Reply:Some do, some dont.
Reply:yes some catogaries like
facultative anaerobes and aerobes and microaerophiles
Reply:"Aerobic" bacteria do, "anaerobic" bacteria don't. The type name explains it all.
Reply:Yes... it does nid oxygen for growth...and mostly warmth
Reply:Yes, bacteria can survive without oxygen.
Reply:yes
Do bacteria require oxygen for growth?
yes ofcourse they require oxygen for respiration if they are aerobic bacteria. oxygen helps in respiration to break sugars down to release energy used in cell mechanisms and growth.
this releases CO2.
however, there are anaerbic bacteria that dont require oxygen, but they require CO2.
Reply:Some do, some dont.
Reply:yes some catogaries like
facultative anaerobes and aerobes and microaerophiles
Reply:"Aerobic" bacteria do, "anaerobic" bacteria don't. The type name explains it all.
Reply:Yes... it does nid oxygen for growth...and mostly warmth
Reply:Yes, bacteria can survive without oxygen.
Reply:yes
Do bacteria require oxygen for growth?
plsssssssssss help me!!!!!!
Do bacteria require oxygen for growth?
yes ofcourse they require oxygen for respiration if they are aerobic bacteria. oxygen helps in respiration to break sugars down to release energy used in cell mechanisms and growth.
this releases CO2.
however, there are anaerbic bacteria that dont require oxygen, but they require CO2.
Reply:Some do, some dont.
Reply:yes some catogaries like
facultative anaerobes and aerobes and microaerophiles
Reply:"Aerobic" bacteria do, "anaerobic" bacteria don't. The type name explains it all.
Reply:Yes... it does nid oxygen for growth...and mostly warmth
Reply:Yes, bacteria can survive without oxygen.
Reply:yes
frangipni
Do bacteria require oxygen for growth?
yes ofcourse they require oxygen for respiration if they are aerobic bacteria. oxygen helps in respiration to break sugars down to release energy used in cell mechanisms and growth.
this releases CO2.
however, there are anaerbic bacteria that dont require oxygen, but they require CO2.
Reply:Some do, some dont.
Reply:yes some catogaries like
facultative anaerobes and aerobes and microaerophiles
Reply:"Aerobic" bacteria do, "anaerobic" bacteria don't. The type name explains it all.
Reply:Yes... it does nid oxygen for growth...and mostly warmth
Reply:Yes, bacteria can survive without oxygen.
Reply:yes
frangipni
Does bacteria and fungi benefit groundwater?
There is no grass in groundwater. Groundwater is several feet under ground in most places. The water table (the top level of groundwater in aquifers) holds water that many towns drill into and pump the water up in wells to use. There isn't a lot of pollutants in the water because the soil cleanses the water on the way down to the groundwater. The only thing that needs to be done to make groundwater drinkable (potable) in most cases is to soften it. But, the bacteria do biodegrade (eat) a lot of the pollutants that do make it to the groundwater from leaks in storage tanks. So bacteria do act as a natural defense to pollutants.
Does bacteria and fungi benefit groundwater?
yes, because it in some wierd way it polinates the water system and makes the grass grow taller and it accually makes the chlorafil stronger.
Does bacteria and fungi benefit groundwater?
yes, because it in some wierd way it polinates the water system and makes the grass grow taller and it accually makes the chlorafil stronger.
What bacteria are on penis and vagina?
Are they the same? Or do they vary?
Can I get some info on the types, what do they do ... etc ?
What bacteria are on penis and vagina?
www.webmd.com
Can I get some info on the types, what do they do ... etc ?
What bacteria are on penis and vagina?
www.webmd.com
Which bacteria is used in production of curd?
lacto bacillus
Which bacteria is used in production of curd?
they cause the fermentation to take place so milk gets converted to curd! its lacto bacillus
Reply:Generally, a mixture of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus have been used to produce yogurt and are present in the starter. If you were talking about yogurt
Reply:u bacterias
Which bacteria is used in production of curd?
they cause the fermentation to take place so milk gets converted to curd! its lacto bacillus
Reply:Generally, a mixture of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus have been used to produce yogurt and are present in the starter. If you were talking about yogurt
Reply:u bacterias
To keep spirits high & bacteria away, we only drink beer on board. Would you like to sign up?
God save the drag queen! Burp.
To keep spirits high %26amp; bacteria away, we only drink beer on board. Would you like to sign up?
Yes please, I need a drink right about now...
Reply:haha no thanks, im a lightweight and couldnt survive on beer alone
Reply:Yes, sign me up!!
Reply:I'm there already - thanks man!!!
Reply:Aye Aye Cap'n. I could use another ship ... I mean sip. Can I borrow the purser's keys? Just need me personals alock.
Reply:Since I already live on the ship as the mouser in command pass me a beer! Meowwwwwwww meowwwwwwww meowwwwwwwww.....I think I had a little too much.
Reply:Well, only if it's GOOD beer. None of that American crap like Budweiser.
Got any Bass, Cap'n?
bleeding heart
To keep spirits high %26amp; bacteria away, we only drink beer on board. Would you like to sign up?
Yes please, I need a drink right about now...
Reply:haha no thanks, im a lightweight and couldnt survive on beer alone
Reply:Yes, sign me up!!
Reply:I'm there already - thanks man!!!
Reply:Aye Aye Cap'n. I could use another ship ... I mean sip. Can I borrow the purser's keys? Just need me personals alock.
Reply:Since I already live on the ship as the mouser in command pass me a beer! Meowwwwwwww meowwwwwwww meowwwwwwwww.....I think I had a little too much.
Reply:Well, only if it's GOOD beer. None of that American crap like Budweiser.
Got any Bass, Cap'n?
bleeding heart
What is the good bacteria in your digestive tracts name?
you know that bateria in your stomach well I need to know what it is for my project
What is the good bacteria in your digestive tracts name?
Probiotics are bacteria in the intestinal tract serving as an antibiotic to the bad ones.
Reply:Your stomach is pretty barren under normal circumstances. Your intestines are populated by a bewildering and everchanging variety of bacteria, such as escherichia coli, bifidus digestivum, a bunch of different kinds of lactobacillus...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gut_flora
Reply:its "Lactobacillus"
What is the good bacteria in your digestive tracts name?
Probiotics are bacteria in the intestinal tract serving as an antibiotic to the bad ones.
Reply:Your stomach is pretty barren under normal circumstances. Your intestines are populated by a bewildering and everchanging variety of bacteria, such as escherichia coli, bifidus digestivum, a bunch of different kinds of lactobacillus...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gut_flora
Reply:its "Lactobacillus"
Why does acidity effect bacteria growth -?
there seems to be no websites on it :S if any one knows any?? or any books? cheers
Why does acidity effect bacteria growth -?
Bacteria digest externally through the use of enzymes.
The `PH' changes the effectiveness of the enzymes.
Eg. :Botullinus grows well in basic environments, but can't
grow in acid ones.
Reply:Some organisms only like low pH and some like high pH. It varies from organism to organism.
go here on the web page i cite
The Effect of pH on Growth
Reply:Acidity does not affect the growth of all organisms, otherwise the yogurt would not have been produced. However, in most cases, acid denatures vital proteins necessary for the growth of the organisms. Consequently, the organisms die in an acidic environment.
Why does acidity effect bacteria growth -?
Bacteria digest externally through the use of enzymes.
The `PH' changes the effectiveness of the enzymes.
Eg. :Botullinus grows well in basic environments, but can't
grow in acid ones.
Reply:Some organisms only like low pH and some like high pH. It varies from organism to organism.
go here on the web page i cite
The Effect of pH on Growth
Reply:Acidity does not affect the growth of all organisms, otherwise the yogurt would not have been produced. However, in most cases, acid denatures vital proteins necessary for the growth of the organisms. Consequently, the organisms die in an acidic environment.
Bacteria that lives on and produces isopropol alcohol?
Isopropyl alcohol is not a product of any living organism. Some bacterial produce ethanol, but not isopropyl alcohol -- which, by the way, is somewhat poisonous.
Bacteria that lives on and produces isopropol alcohol?
i don't believe there is one, since iso alc is used to clean and sterilize things in medicine.
Reply:The only bacteria I'm aware of that *might* be able to produce it is Zymomonas mobilis, which because it produces alcohol from simple sugars and has been used in some dna experiments to produce ethanol may be able to if similarly altered. I know of none that consumes it as a nutrient.
Reply:Energetically speaking this is not possible - an organism cannot extract any energy from a substance if it both lives on and produces it.
So - answer: no!
Bacteria that lives on and produces isopropol alcohol?
i don't believe there is one, since iso alc is used to clean and sterilize things in medicine.
Reply:The only bacteria I'm aware of that *might* be able to produce it is Zymomonas mobilis, which because it produces alcohol from simple sugars and has been used in some dna experiments to produce ethanol may be able to if similarly altered. I know of none that consumes it as a nutrient.
Reply:Energetically speaking this is not possible - an organism cannot extract any energy from a substance if it both lives on and produces it.
So - answer: no!
Bacteria Help?
True or False?
1. Fungus cells are eukaryotic
2. Fungus cells can make there own food
3. Fungi spread from place to place through the production of mycorrhizae
4. Tenicillin is an important anti-biotic produce by fungi
5. Lichens grow on the roots of plants to help them grow.
Plz help
Bacteria Help?
This has nothing to do w/ bacteria, fyi...
1. true
2. false (and it's "their" own food, not "there")
3. FALSE (the previous person was wrong); fungi spread by hyphae. Mycorrhizae is the association between a plant and fungus.
4. penicillin? tenicillin is not a word
5. false--algae + fungus, not plant + fungus
Reply:True
False
True
Not sure if you misspelled this, but I'd say FALSE. It's penicillim.
False
Reply:Why do you say that you need bacteria help? You are asking about Fungi which is a very different Kingdom.
1. True
2. False - Fungi are heterotrophs
3. False - Fungi spread by hyphae/spores
4. False - Penicillin is an antibiotic
5. False - Mycorrhizae grow on plant roots and help them grow
Reply:1. True
2. False
3. False
4. Penicillin? TRUE!! It comes from penicillium which is a FUNGUS!
5. False
Reply:These are not the expected answers to your home work but will help answer your home work quesitons. Hope it helps!
1. The eukaryotes include ourselves, other animals, plants and fungi and a rich variety of micro-organisms (protists). CAn you answer the question now?
2. Fungi absorb nutrients from living or dead organic matter (plant or animal stuff) that they grow on. They absorb simple, easily dissolved nutrients, such as sugars, through their cell walls. They give off special digestive enzymes to break down complex nutrients into simpler forms that they can absorb.Most fungi can best be described as grazers, but a few are active hunters. Hunter fungi prey on tiny protozoa and worm-like creatures called nematodes. Some produce a sticky substance on their hyphae, which then act like flypaper, trapping passing prey. A species called Arthrobotrys dactyloides sets snares made out of loops formed by its hyphae.
3. The word "mycorrhizae" literally means "fungus-roots" and defines the close mutually beneficial relationship between specialized soil fungi (mycorrhizal fungi) and plant roots.
4. Try Penicillin and that is an antibiotoic produced from fungi!
5. Lichens grow in the leftover spots of the natural world that are too harsh or limited for most other organisms. They are pioneers on bare rock, desert sand, cleared soil , dead wood, animal bones, rusty metal, and living bark. Able to shut down metabolically during periods of unfavorable conditions, they can survive extremes of heat, cold, and drought.
Reply:True ( eukaryote means cells have a nucleus)
false ( only plants that photosynthesise and chemotrophs at the bottom of the ocean are preoducers....fungi "eat" other things)
Hmmm fungi generally spread by SPORES or thru the MYCELIUM/HYPHAE....so False
False..assume they mean penicillin
5. FALSE....mycorrhizae do....myco = fungi and rhizea = roots
street fighting
1. Fungus cells are eukaryotic
2. Fungus cells can make there own food
3. Fungi spread from place to place through the production of mycorrhizae
4. Tenicillin is an important anti-biotic produce by fungi
5. Lichens grow on the roots of plants to help them grow.
Plz help
Bacteria Help?
This has nothing to do w/ bacteria, fyi...
1. true
2. false (and it's "their" own food, not "there")
3. FALSE (the previous person was wrong); fungi spread by hyphae. Mycorrhizae is the association between a plant and fungus.
4. penicillin? tenicillin is not a word
5. false--algae + fungus, not plant + fungus
Reply:True
False
True
Not sure if you misspelled this, but I'd say FALSE. It's penicillim.
False
Reply:Why do you say that you need bacteria help? You are asking about Fungi which is a very different Kingdom.
1. True
2. False - Fungi are heterotrophs
3. False - Fungi spread by hyphae/spores
4. False - Penicillin is an antibiotic
5. False - Mycorrhizae grow on plant roots and help them grow
Reply:1. True
2. False
3. False
4. Penicillin? TRUE!! It comes from penicillium which is a FUNGUS!
5. False
Reply:These are not the expected answers to your home work but will help answer your home work quesitons. Hope it helps!
1. The eukaryotes include ourselves, other animals, plants and fungi and a rich variety of micro-organisms (protists). CAn you answer the question now?
2. Fungi absorb nutrients from living or dead organic matter (plant or animal stuff) that they grow on. They absorb simple, easily dissolved nutrients, such as sugars, through their cell walls. They give off special digestive enzymes to break down complex nutrients into simpler forms that they can absorb.Most fungi can best be described as grazers, but a few are active hunters. Hunter fungi prey on tiny protozoa and worm-like creatures called nematodes. Some produce a sticky substance on their hyphae, which then act like flypaper, trapping passing prey. A species called Arthrobotrys dactyloides sets snares made out of loops formed by its hyphae.
3. The word "mycorrhizae" literally means "fungus-roots" and defines the close mutually beneficial relationship between specialized soil fungi (mycorrhizal fungi) and plant roots.
4. Try Penicillin and that is an antibiotoic produced from fungi!
5. Lichens grow in the leftover spots of the natural world that are too harsh or limited for most other organisms. They are pioneers on bare rock, desert sand, cleared soil , dead wood, animal bones, rusty metal, and living bark. Able to shut down metabolically during periods of unfavorable conditions, they can survive extremes of heat, cold, and drought.
Reply:True ( eukaryote means cells have a nucleus)
false ( only plants that photosynthesise and chemotrophs at the bottom of the ocean are preoducers....fungi "eat" other things)
Hmmm fungi generally spread by SPORES or thru the MYCELIUM/HYPHAE....so False
False..assume they mean penicillin
5. FALSE....mycorrhizae do....myco = fungi and rhizea = roots
street fighting
Bacteria in 20 gal?
i have two goldfish in a twenty gallon...no matter what i do (change filter, clean filter, siphon tank etc)...i cannot get this bacterial infection to leave the tank...how can i get rid of this...i have already had my hillstream loach die..and it was a favorite of mine
Bacteria in 20 gal?
I suggest adding aquarium salt: 1 tbl spoon per every 5 gallons and change the water frequently. If this doesn't work then you might need to use anibiotics. I do not know the proper way to use it so raise your question on this forum, a lot of experts will answer your questions: http://www.goldfishparadise.com/forum/ph...
Reply:What kind of infection? How do you know it is bacterial? A bit of background on the symptoms of your fish would be helpful.
**
Bacteria in 20 gal?
I suggest adding aquarium salt: 1 tbl spoon per every 5 gallons and change the water frequently. If this doesn't work then you might need to use anibiotics. I do not know the proper way to use it so raise your question on this forum, a lot of experts will answer your questions: http://www.goldfishparadise.com/forum/ph...
Reply:What kind of infection? How do you know it is bacterial? A bit of background on the symptoms of your fish would be helpful.
**
Bacteria in your mouth break down food to produce acid (HA), which is harmful to teeth.?
a) suggest a readily available compound that could be used to remove the acid
b) write an equation for this reaction and say what type of reaction this is
anyone?
Bacteria in your mouth break down food to produce acid (HA), which is harmful to teeth.?
Under no circumstances should you use aqueous ammonia (NH4OH or NH3(aq) ) to neutralize the acid formed in bacterial digestion.
Aqeous ammonia is a poison. This is why your local poison control center gives Mr. Yuck stickers to put on Windex and other household cleaners that are ammonia solutions. From the MSDS sheet on aqueous ammonia (ammonium hydroxide), 10-35%:
SAF-T-DATA(tm) Ratings (Provided here for your convenience)
--------------------------------------...
Health Rating: 3 - Severe (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 0 - None
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 4 - Extreme (Corrosive)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES %26amp; SHIELD; LAB COAT %26amp; APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES
Storage Color Code: White Stripe (Store Separately)
The user who suggested baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) was spot-on. Normally I wouldn't post an answer to a question with such a correct answer, but I had this horrible fear that you might (or someone reading it might) get the idea to drink an ammonia solution, say to negate the effect of carbonic acid on teeth. Stick with your baking soda, please.
Reply:Oh, sodium hydroxide, for example. Or, say, ammonia. Ammonia is available as a household cleaner. Or, I dunno, readily available? Some harmless base. I can't think of any off the top of my head right now. I'll wager there's one in toothpaste.
Say the base you found is represented by BOH, because it has hydroxide in it....
then HA + BOH --%26gt; H2O + BA
Or say it doesn't. Say it's ammonia, for instance, NH3. Then you'd have
HA + NH3 --%26gt; [A]+ + NH4+
Ammonium, as ions go, is probably fairly innocuous. (I said PROBABLY. Don't take my word for it, for God's sake.) This would be, for your edification, an acid-base reaction.
Reply:a) Drink lots of water to dilute and remove the acid.
OR
Use baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) to convert the acid to harmless chemicals
HA + NaHCO3 --%26gt; NaA + H2O + CO2
Reaction is a neutralization one with decomposition of the weak acid (carbonic acid) that is formed.
Carbonic acid = H2CO3 and will spontaneously breakdown to CO2 and water. A soda (pepsi or coke) are good examples of this decomposition.
b) write an equation for this reaction and say what type of reaction this is
anyone?
Bacteria in your mouth break down food to produce acid (HA), which is harmful to teeth.?
Under no circumstances should you use aqueous ammonia (NH4OH or NH3(aq) ) to neutralize the acid formed in bacterial digestion.
Aqeous ammonia is a poison. This is why your local poison control center gives Mr. Yuck stickers to put on Windex and other household cleaners that are ammonia solutions. From the MSDS sheet on aqueous ammonia (ammonium hydroxide), 10-35%:
SAF-T-DATA(tm) Ratings (Provided here for your convenience)
--------------------------------------...
Health Rating: 3 - Severe (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 0 - None
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 4 - Extreme (Corrosive)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES %26amp; SHIELD; LAB COAT %26amp; APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES
Storage Color Code: White Stripe (Store Separately)
The user who suggested baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) was spot-on. Normally I wouldn't post an answer to a question with such a correct answer, but I had this horrible fear that you might (or someone reading it might) get the idea to drink an ammonia solution, say to negate the effect of carbonic acid on teeth. Stick with your baking soda, please.
Reply:Oh, sodium hydroxide, for example. Or, say, ammonia. Ammonia is available as a household cleaner. Or, I dunno, readily available? Some harmless base. I can't think of any off the top of my head right now. I'll wager there's one in toothpaste.
Say the base you found is represented by BOH, because it has hydroxide in it....
then HA + BOH --%26gt; H2O + BA
Or say it doesn't. Say it's ammonia, for instance, NH3. Then you'd have
HA + NH3 --%26gt; [A]+ + NH4+
Ammonium, as ions go, is probably fairly innocuous. (I said PROBABLY. Don't take my word for it, for God's sake.) This would be, for your edification, an acid-base reaction.
Reply:a) Drink lots of water to dilute and remove the acid.
OR
Use baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) to convert the acid to harmless chemicals
HA + NaHCO3 --%26gt; NaA + H2O + CO2
Reaction is a neutralization one with decomposition of the weak acid (carbonic acid) that is formed.
Carbonic acid = H2CO3 and will spontaneously breakdown to CO2 and water. A soda (pepsi or coke) are good examples of this decomposition.
Bacteria/Virus Infection Articles?
are there websites where i can find bacterial infection and viral infection articles
Bacteria/Virus Infection Articles?
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/viral...
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/health_advice...
http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/mmi/jmoodie/v...
Reply:www.cdc.gov, www.who.int
grappling
Bacteria/Virus Infection Articles?
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/viral...
http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/health_advice...
http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/mmi/jmoodie/v...
Reply:www.cdc.gov, www.who.int
grappling
A cell of some bacteria divides into two cells every 30 minuntes. The initial population is 5 bacteria?
Hint: The calculation will be easier if you let the unit of time be 20 minutes, so that one hour is (60/30) units of time.
Find the population after t hours
FInd the population after 2 hours .
When will the population reach 10?
A cell of some bacteria divides into two cells every 30 minuntes. The initial population is 5 bacteria?
q1
P(t) = 5*2^(t/(1/2) = 5*2^(2t)
q2
P(2) = 5*2^(2*2) = 5*16 = 80
q3
10 = 5*2^(2t)
2^(2t) = 10/5 = 2^1
2t = 1
t = 1/2 hour = 30 mins
Reply:Let T be a time period in which the population doubles (in this case 30 mins but don’t worry about that right now)
At T = 0 y = 5
At T= 1 y = 5 x 2^1 (= 5 x 2 = 10 as a check for the pattern)
at T = 2 y = 5 x 2^2 (= 5 x 4 = 20)
At T = 3 y = 5 x 2^3 (= 5 x 8 = 40)
So when T = n y = 5 x 2^n
But T = 30t, where t is the time in minutes
So when t = 30 y = 5 x 2^1
when t = 60 y = 5 x 2^2
when t = 90 y = 5 x 2^3
So to find what power of 2 we need, can you see that you take the time and divide it by 30?
So instead of T = 5 x 2^n
you have t = 5 X 2 ^ ……..?
PS to find when the population reaches 10, you takes logs of both sides - that is the only way to get n on its own
Find the population after t hours
FInd the population after 2 hours .
When will the population reach 10?
A cell of some bacteria divides into two cells every 30 minuntes. The initial population is 5 bacteria?
q1
P(t) = 5*2^(t/(1/2) = 5*2^(2t)
q2
P(2) = 5*2^(2*2) = 5*16 = 80
q3
10 = 5*2^(2t)
2^(2t) = 10/5 = 2^1
2t = 1
t = 1/2 hour = 30 mins
Reply:Let T be a time period in which the population doubles (in this case 30 mins but don’t worry about that right now)
At T = 0 y = 5
At T= 1 y = 5 x 2^1 (= 5 x 2 = 10 as a check for the pattern)
at T = 2 y = 5 x 2^2 (= 5 x 4 = 20)
At T = 3 y = 5 x 2^3 (= 5 x 8 = 40)
So when T = n y = 5 x 2^n
But T = 30t, where t is the time in minutes
So when t = 30 y = 5 x 2^1
when t = 60 y = 5 x 2^2
when t = 90 y = 5 x 2^3
So to find what power of 2 we need, can you see that you take the time and divide it by 30?
So instead of T = 5 x 2^n
you have t = 5 X 2 ^ ……..?
PS to find when the population reaches 10, you takes logs of both sides - that is the only way to get n on its own
Bacteria vary in size, diameter usually is 2.00micrometer. What is the (a) the volume (in cubic centimeters)?
http://www.knowledgerush.com/wiki_image/...
Which kind?
Which kind?
Bacteria vs. fungi?
why is a fungal infection more difficult to get rid of than a bacterial infection? what makes fungi so special?
Bacteria vs. fungi?
Bacteria are prokaryotes, while fungi (and humans) are eukaryotes. It is easier to fight a bacterial infection with drugs because their cellular machinery is very different from ours, while the fungal cellular machinery is more closely related. So designing drugs to kill the fungal cells and not the human cells is tougher.
Reply:Resistant spores and hyphae.
Bacteria vs. fungi?
Bacteria are prokaryotes, while fungi (and humans) are eukaryotes. It is easier to fight a bacterial infection with drugs because their cellular machinery is very different from ours, while the fungal cellular machinery is more closely related. So designing drugs to kill the fungal cells and not the human cells is tougher.
Reply:Resistant spores and hyphae.
Bacteria play a particulary important role in the ____ cycle.?
a)photosynthesis
b)water
c)nitrogen
d)climate
Bacteria play a particulary important role in the ____ cycle.?
C) nitrogen
Reply:Nitrogen cycle. They fix nitrogen in the soil so that plants might use it for food. But note that one-cell organisms in the ocean account for a huge amount of oxygen released into the air that we breath, and without them most animal life on earth would die. Consider "the oxygen cycle" as a potential anwser if this question is ever asked by you again.
Reply:c- nitrogen
yoga
b)water
c)nitrogen
d)climate
Bacteria play a particulary important role in the ____ cycle.?
C) nitrogen
Reply:Nitrogen cycle. They fix nitrogen in the soil so that plants might use it for food. But note that one-cell organisms in the ocean account for a huge amount of oxygen released into the air that we breath, and without them most animal life on earth would die. Consider "the oxygen cycle" as a potential anwser if this question is ever asked by you again.
Reply:c- nitrogen
yoga
Bacteria vaginosis???? sexually transmitted??
does this mean my boyfriend cheated???
Bacteria vaginosis???? sexually transmitted??
Unfortunately, bacterial vaginosis is not completely understood. They are ideas at who is more at risk but even those are pretty vague. The only thing that is known is that there are more bacteria than normal. Please read up from the CDC. I find their info is the most reliable since it is a government health agency
http://www.cdc.gov/std/BV/STDFact-Bacter...
Reply:it could be but then maby not.. but srry to say he probably did because if you two were ative before and this just happend out of the blue i would have a little chit chat with him and maby go ask your doc. and he should know for sure.. hope everything works out and if you need any support just email me and maby i can help!!! :) good luck!!
Reply:No not necessarily. Vaginoses is an overgrowth of bacteria in that particular area. Your body has what is called normal flora and it consists of bacteria, fungi, and parasites that live on your skin. I know this sounds gross but it is what it is. They all are in balance with each other, sometimes one will get out of hand and over grow in a certain area. Like a yeast infection that happens when the fungi grows too quickly and more yeast is present than the bacteria and parasites. It is mostly nothing and all you need to do is go to the DR and get a prescription for an antibiotic to treat this.
I wouldn't suggest you have sex right now and ask your dr about this he/she will explain it better than I can over the PC.
Reply:Hi there,
No, bacterial vaginosis is not transmitted from men to women so that fact that you have it does not mean that he cheated on you per se.
Bacterial vaginosis is a change in the balance of bacteria that are normally present in the vagina, which can cause bothersome symptoms. It is the most common cause of vaginal symptoms in women of childbearing age.
The cause of bacterial vaginosis is poorly understood. But, experts have found a number of risk factors that can lead to a drop in "good" lactobacillus. (These bacteria normally keep "bad" bacteria from overgrowing in the vagina. They are different from dairy lactobacillus.) These risk factors include having multiple sex partners, having a female sex partner, recent or current infection with certain sexually transmitted diseases, douching, and intrauterine device (IUD) use.
Bacterial vaginosis is sometimes linked to hormonal changes; it is more common after menstruation. Nearly 1 in 4 pregnant women are diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis.
Bacterial vaginosis may be passed between women during sexual contact. If you have a female sexual partner, you may benefit from using condoms with or careful washing of shared sex items.
Bacterial vaginosis is not passed between men and women and is not considered a sexually transmitted disease (STD). (But if you are exposed to an STD while you have bacterial vaginosis, you are more likely to be infected by that disease.)
It is always important to practice safe sex to prevent sexually transmitted diseases, whether or not you have bacterial vaginosis. Preventing an STD is easier than treating an infection after it occurs.
Hope this helps clarify things for you.
Cheers.
Reply:I work in a doctors office and NO it is not sexually transmitted.
Reply:BV is not an STD
Bacteria vaginosis???? sexually transmitted??
Unfortunately, bacterial vaginosis is not completely understood. They are ideas at who is more at risk but even those are pretty vague. The only thing that is known is that there are more bacteria than normal. Please read up from the CDC. I find their info is the most reliable since it is a government health agency
http://www.cdc.gov/std/BV/STDFact-Bacter...
Reply:it could be but then maby not.. but srry to say he probably did because if you two were ative before and this just happend out of the blue i would have a little chit chat with him and maby go ask your doc. and he should know for sure.. hope everything works out and if you need any support just email me and maby i can help!!! :) good luck!!
Reply:No not necessarily. Vaginoses is an overgrowth of bacteria in that particular area. Your body has what is called normal flora and it consists of bacteria, fungi, and parasites that live on your skin. I know this sounds gross but it is what it is. They all are in balance with each other, sometimes one will get out of hand and over grow in a certain area. Like a yeast infection that happens when the fungi grows too quickly and more yeast is present than the bacteria and parasites. It is mostly nothing and all you need to do is go to the DR and get a prescription for an antibiotic to treat this.
I wouldn't suggest you have sex right now and ask your dr about this he/she will explain it better than I can over the PC.
Reply:Hi there,
No, bacterial vaginosis is not transmitted from men to women so that fact that you have it does not mean that he cheated on you per se.
Bacterial vaginosis is a change in the balance of bacteria that are normally present in the vagina, which can cause bothersome symptoms. It is the most common cause of vaginal symptoms in women of childbearing age.
The cause of bacterial vaginosis is poorly understood. But, experts have found a number of risk factors that can lead to a drop in "good" lactobacillus. (These bacteria normally keep "bad" bacteria from overgrowing in the vagina. They are different from dairy lactobacillus.) These risk factors include having multiple sex partners, having a female sex partner, recent or current infection with certain sexually transmitted diseases, douching, and intrauterine device (IUD) use.
Bacterial vaginosis is sometimes linked to hormonal changes; it is more common after menstruation. Nearly 1 in 4 pregnant women are diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis.
Bacterial vaginosis may be passed between women during sexual contact. If you have a female sexual partner, you may benefit from using condoms with or careful washing of shared sex items.
Bacterial vaginosis is not passed between men and women and is not considered a sexually transmitted disease (STD). (But if you are exposed to an STD while you have bacterial vaginosis, you are more likely to be infected by that disease.)
It is always important to practice safe sex to prevent sexually transmitted diseases, whether or not you have bacterial vaginosis. Preventing an STD is easier than treating an infection after it occurs.
Hope this helps clarify things for you.
Cheers.
Reply:I work in a doctors office and NO it is not sexually transmitted.
Reply:BV is not an STD
Bacteria or something on my clothes?
my nice new shirts and pants were sitting in a plastic bag, wet for like a week or something. Finally I have time to wash them, but theres these scary little red stain marks all over my nice new shirt!, and other clothes. How can I get this out, or is this 100% permanent.
Now I know to not leave dirty damp clothes in a bag...
Bacteria or something on my clothes?
This has never happened to me but I would say use clorox stain remover! SPRAY IT, PUT SOAP ON IT,AND WASH AGAIN!!!!! If that doesent work, I would say throw away the shirt!! OR OR OR, you can take the risk of fading clothes and bleach the shirt like crazy!
Reply:Wt clothing usually produces mildew, which should have given you an indication when you reopened the bag. Would suspect the red spots are some kind of mold, perhaps from material itself or from something in the bag.
Take them to a dry cleaner and explain. Let someone else use more powerful cleansers than clorox and market soap.
Reply:It's a mold. The white clothes I suggest soaking in hot soapy bleach water. The colored clothes you could try soaking in hot water with a cup or two of white vinegar..They may be ruined forever...
Reply:There is a red-colored mildew or mold.
Here are instructions for "cotton" clothing ....
"Always follow garment label instructions when pretreating and laundering your clothes. For colored garments, test an inside seam for colorfastness. If the garment is washable, follow the instructions below..."
"Launder stain with Purex detergent, 20 Mule Team Borax, and bleach if recommended for garment. If stain remains, sponge stain with hydrogen peroxide and relaunder. Dry in sunlight. Note: Some badly mildewed fabrics may be damaged beyone repair."
Am sure you can substitute Purex with your own brand of clothes detergent.
Best of luck!
ivy
Now I know to not leave dirty damp clothes in a bag...
Bacteria or something on my clothes?
This has never happened to me but I would say use clorox stain remover! SPRAY IT, PUT SOAP ON IT,AND WASH AGAIN!!!!! If that doesent work, I would say throw away the shirt!! OR OR OR, you can take the risk of fading clothes and bleach the shirt like crazy!
Reply:Wt clothing usually produces mildew, which should have given you an indication when you reopened the bag. Would suspect the red spots are some kind of mold, perhaps from material itself or from something in the bag.
Take them to a dry cleaner and explain. Let someone else use more powerful cleansers than clorox and market soap.
Reply:It's a mold. The white clothes I suggest soaking in hot soapy bleach water. The colored clothes you could try soaking in hot water with a cup or two of white vinegar..They may be ruined forever...
Reply:There is a red-colored mildew or mold.
Here are instructions for "cotton" clothing ....
"Always follow garment label instructions when pretreating and laundering your clothes. For colored garments, test an inside seam for colorfastness. If the garment is washable, follow the instructions below..."
"Launder stain with Purex detergent, 20 Mule Team Borax, and bleach if recommended for garment. If stain remains, sponge stain with hydrogen peroxide and relaunder. Dry in sunlight. Note: Some badly mildewed fabrics may be damaged beyone repair."
Am sure you can substitute Purex with your own brand of clothes detergent.
Best of luck!
ivy
Bacteria and archaeans have which of the following characteristics in common?
A.
Both are eukaryotic.
B.
Both are prokaryotic.
C.
They are more similar to each other than to eukaryotes.
D.
They both have a nucleus.
Bacteria and archaeans have which of the following characteristics in common?
B
Both are eukaryotic.
B.
Both are prokaryotic.
C.
They are more similar to each other than to eukaryotes.
D.
They both have a nucleus.
Bacteria and archaeans have which of the following characteristics in common?
B
What was the first bacteria and who was the first person to discover it?
bacteria was hypothesized before the actual discovery in the 17th century. The first theory was by Marcus Terentious Varro in a book called "on agriculture"
bacteria was first observed by Anton Van Leeuwenhoek in 1676 by using a single-lens microscope of his own design. He called them "animalcules"
What was the first bacteria and who was the first person to discover it?
Antony van Leeuwenhoek first discovered bacteria
The first bacteria were anaerobic, able to live without oxygen...
bacteria was first observed by Anton Van Leeuwenhoek in 1676 by using a single-lens microscope of his own design. He called them "animalcules"
What was the first bacteria and who was the first person to discover it?
Antony van Leeuwenhoek first discovered bacteria
The first bacteria were anaerobic, able to live without oxygen...
Why are so many bacteria found at the bottom of the ocean and sea?
There are many bacteria on the sea floor because they feed on the bodies of dead sea creatures that fall to the ocean floor. Also, the bacteria feed on the chemicals that flow from hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor.
Why are so many bacteria found at the bottom of the ocean and sea?
Because the bottom of the sea is rich in all kinds of minerals and decaying debris. Its the same reason why you find more bacteria in the soil rather than in the air.
Reply:Another reason they are plentiful and other more advanced organisms are not is that they have adapted so that they do not need ogygen to breath, but can use sulfur or nitrogen instead. Deep water is depleted in oxygen.
Why are so many bacteria found at the bottom of the ocean and sea?
Because the bottom of the sea is rich in all kinds of minerals and decaying debris. Its the same reason why you find more bacteria in the soil rather than in the air.
Reply:Another reason they are plentiful and other more advanced organisms are not is that they have adapted so that they do not need ogygen to breath, but can use sulfur or nitrogen instead. Deep water is depleted in oxygen.
Bacteria H?
Bacterias starting with H
Bacteria H?
Only one coming to mind is helicobacter pylori. Affects the stomach and duodenum, causing ulcers, gastritis, etc.
Reply:¤ Hafnia Møller 1954 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Hafnia alvei Møller 1954 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Hahella Lee et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Hahella chejuensis Lee et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hahella ganghwensis Baik et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Hahellaceae Garrity et al. 2005, fam. nov.
¤ Haladaptatus Savage et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Haladaptatus paucihalophilus Savage et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Halalkalibacillus Echigo et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Halalkalibacillus halophilus Echigo et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Halalkalicoccus Xue et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Halalkalicoccus jeotgali Roh et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halalkalicoccus tibetensis Xue et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Halanaerobacter corrig. Liaw and Mah 1996, gen. nov.
Halanaerobacter chitinivorans corrig. Liaw and Mah 1996, sp. nov.
Halanaerobacter lacunarum corrig. (Zhilina et al. 1992) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobacter salinarius Mouné et al. 1999, sp. nov.
¤ Halanaerobiaceae corrig. Oren et al. 1984, fam. nov.
¤ Halanaerobiales corrig. Rainey and Zhilina 1995, ord. nov.
¤ Halanaerobium corrig. Zeikus et al. 1984, gen. nov.
Halanaerobium acetethylicum corrig. (Rengpipat et al. 1989) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium alcaliphilum corrig. Tsai et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium congolense corrig. Ravot et al. 1998, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium fermentans corrig. Kobayashi et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium kushneri corrig. Bhupathiraju et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium lacusrosei corrig. Cayol et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium praevalens corrig. Zeikus et al. 1984, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium saccharolyticum corrig. (Zhilina et al. 1992) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium saccharolyticum subsp. saccharolyticum corrig. (Zhilina et al. 1992) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium saccharolyticum subsp. senegalense corrig. (Cayol et al. 1994) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium salsuginis corrig. Bhupathiraju et al. 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Haliangium Fudou et al. 2002, gen. nov.
Haliangium ochraceum Fudou et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Haliangium tepidum Fudou et al. 2002, sp. nov.
¤ Haliscomenobacter van Veen et al. 1973 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Haliscomenobacter hydrossis van Veen et al. 1973 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Hallella Moore and Moore 1994, gen. nov.
Hallella seregens Moore and Moore 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Haloarcula Torreblanca et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Haloarcula amylolytica Yang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloarcula argentinensis Ihara et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Haloarcula hispanica Juez et al. 1986, sp. nov.
Haloarcula japonica Takashina et al. 1991, sp. nov.
Haloarcula marismortui (ex Volcani 1940) Oren et al. 1990, nom. rev., comb. nov.
Haloarcula mukohataei Ihara et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Haloarcula quadrata Oren et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Haloarcula vallismortis (Gonzalez et al. 1979) Torreblanca et al. 1986, comb. nov.
¤ Halobacillus Spring et al. 1996, gen. nov.
Halobacillus aidingensis Liu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobacillus campisalis Yoon et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus dabanensis Liu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobacillus faecis An et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus halophilus (Claus et al. 1984) Spring et al. 1996, comb. nov.
Halobacillus karajensis Amoozegar et al. 2003, sp. nov.
Halobacillus kuroshimensis Hua et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus litoralis Spring et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halobacillus locisalis Yoon et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halobacillus profundi Hua et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus salinus Yoon et al. 2003, sp. nov.
Halobacillus trueperi Spring et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halobacillus yeomjeoni Yoon et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Halobacteria Grant et al. 2002, class. nov.
¤ Halobacteriaceae Gibbons 1974 (Approved Lists 1980), familia.
¤ Halobacteriales Grant and Larsen 1989, ord. nov.
¤ Halobacterium Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Halobacterium cutirubrum (Lochhead 1934) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium denitrificans Tomlinson et al. 1986, sp. nov.
Halobacterium distributum corrig. Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989, sp. nov.
Halobacterium halobium (Petter 1931) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium jilantaiense Yang et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halobacterium lacusprofundi Franzmann et al. 1989, sp. nov.
Halobacterium mediterranei Rodriguez-Valera et al. 1983, sp. nov.
Halobacterium noricense Gruber et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobacterium pharaonis Soliman and Trüper 1983, sp. nov.
Halobacterium saccharovorum Tomlinson and Hochstein 1977 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium salinarum corrig. (Harrison and Kennedy 1922) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium sodomense Oren 1983, sp. nov.
Halobacterium trapanicum (Petter 1931) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium vallismortis Gonzalez et al. 1979 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium volcanii Mullakhanbhai and Larsen 1975 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Halobacteroidaceae Zhilina and Rainey 1995, fam. nov.
¤ Halobacteroides Oren et al. 1984, gen. nov.
Halobacteroides acetoethylicus Rengpipat et al. 1989, sp. nov.
Halobacteroides elegans Zhilina et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Halobacteroides halobius Oren et al. 1984, sp. nov.
Halobacteroides lacunaris Zhilina et al. 1992, sp. nov.
¤ Halobaculum Oren et al. 1995, gen. nov.
Halobaculum gomorrense Oren et al. 1995, sp. nov.
¤ Halobiforma Hezayen et al. 2002, gen. nov.
Halobiforma haloterrestris Hezayen et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halobiforma lacisalsi Xu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobiforma nitratireducens (Xin et al. 2001) Hezayen et al. 2002, comb. nov.
¤ Halocella Simankova et al. 1994, gen. nov.
Halocella cellulosilytica corrig. Simankova et al. 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Halochromatium Imhoff et al. 1998, gen. nov.
Halochromatium glycolicum (Caumette et al. 1997) Imhoff et al. 1998, comb. nov.
Halochromatium roseum Anil Kumar et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halochromatium salexigens (Caumette et al. 1989) Imhoff et al. 1998, comb. nov.
¤ Halococcus Schoop 1935 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Halococcus dombrowskii Stan-Lotter et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halococcus hamelinensis Goh et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halococcus morrhuae (Farlow 1880) Kocur and Hodgkiss 1973 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halococcus qingdaonensis Wang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halococcus saccharolyticus Montero et al. 1990, sp. nov.
Halococcus salifodinae Denner et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Halococcus thailandensis Namwong et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halococcus turkmenicus Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989, sp. nov.
¤ Haloferax Torreblanca et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Haloferax alexandrinus Asker and Ohta 2002, sp. nov.
Haloferax denitrificans (Tomlinson et al. 1986) Tindall et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Haloferax gibbonsii Juez et al. 1986, sp. nov.
Haloferax larsenii Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloferax lucentense corrig. Gutierrez et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Haloferax mediterranei (Rodriguez-Valera et al. 1983) Torreblanca et al. 1987, comb. nov.
Haloferax prahovense Enache et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloferax sulfurifontis Elshahed et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Haloferax volcanii (Mullakhanbhai and Larsen 1975) Torreblanca et al. 1986, comb. nov.
¤ Halogeometricum Montalvo-Rodríguez et al. 1998, gen. nov.
Halogeometricum borinquense Montalvo-Rodríguez et al. 1998, sp. nov.
¤ Haloincola Zhilina et al. 1992, gen. nov.
Haloincola saccharolyticus corrig. Zhilina et al. 1992, sp. nov.
Haloincola saccharolyticus subsp. saccharolyticus corrig. Zhilina et al. 1992, subsp. nov.
Haloincola saccharolyticus subsp. senegalensis corrig. Cayol et al. 1994, subsp. nov.
¤ Halolactibacillus Ishikawa et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Halolactibacillus halophilus Ishikawa et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halolactibacillus miurensis Ishikawa et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Halomebacteria Cavalier-Smith 2002, class. nov.
¤ Halomethanococcus Yu and Kawamura 1988, gen. nov.
Halomethanococcus doii Yu and Kawamura 1988, sp. nov.
¤ Halomicrobium Oren et al. 2002, gen. nov.
Halomicrobium mukohataei (Ihara et al. 1997) Oren et al. 2002, comb. nov.
¤ Halomonadaceae Franzmann et al. 1989, fam. nov.
¤ Halomonas Vreeland et al. 1980, gen. nov.
Halomonas alimentaria Yoon et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halomonas alkaliphila Romano et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas almeriensis Martínez-Checa et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halomonas anticariensis Martínez-Cánovas et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas aquamarina (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas arcis Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas avicenniae Soto-Ramírez et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas axialensis Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas boliviensis Quillaguamán et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas campaniensis Romano et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halomonas campisalis Mormile et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Halomonas canadensis Huval et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halomonas cupida (Baumann et al. 1972) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas denitrificans Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas desiderata Berendes et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Halomonas elongata Vreeland et al. 1980, sp. nov.
Halomonas eurihalina (Quesada et al. 1990) Mellado et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halomonas gomseomensis Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas gudaonensis Wang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas halmophila (Elazari-Volcani 1940) Franzmann et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Halomonas halocynthiae Romanenko et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halomonas halodenitrificans (Robinson and Gibbons 1952) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas halodurans Hebert and Vreeland 1987, sp. nov.
Halomonas halophila (Quesada et al. 1984) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas hydrothermalis Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas indalinina Cabrera et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas israelensis Huval et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halomonas janggokensis Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas koreensis Lim et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas kribbensis Jeon et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas magadiensis corrig. Duckworth et al. 2000 (complete authorship reads: Duckworth, Grant, Jones, Márquez and Ventosa), sp. nov.
Halomonas marina (Cobet et al. 1970) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas marisflavi corrig.Yoon et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Halomonas maura Bouchotroch et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Halomonas meridiana James et al. 1990, sp. nov.
Halomonas muralis Heyrman et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halomonas neptunia Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas organivorans García et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas pacifica (Baumann et al. 1972) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas pantelleriensis corrig. Romano et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Halomonas saccharevitans Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas salaria Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas salina (Valderrama et al. 1991) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas shengliensis Wang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas subglaciescola Franzmann et al. 1987, sp. nov.
Halomonas subterranea Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas sulfidaeris Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas taeanensis Lee et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halomonas variabilis (Fendrich 1989) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas ventosae Martínez-Cánovas et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas venusta (Baumann et al. 1972) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
¤ Halonatronum Zhilina et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Halonatronum saccharophilum Zhilina et al. 2001, sp. nov.
¤ Halopiger Gutiérrez et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Halopiger xanaduensis Gutiérrez et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Haloplanus Elevi Bardavid et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Haloplanus natans Elevi Bardavid et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Haloquadratum Burns et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Haloquadratum walsbyi Burns et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Halorhabdus Wainø et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Halorhabdus utahensis Wainø et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Halorhodospira Imhoff and Süling 1997, gen. nov.
Halorhodospira abdelmalekii (Imhoff and Trüper 1982) Imhoff and Süling 1997, comb. nov.
Halorhodospira halochloris (Imhoff and Trüper 1979) Imhoff and Süling 1997, comb. nov.
Halorhodospira halophila (Raymond and Sistrom 1969) Imhoff and Süling 1997, comb. nov.
Halorhodospira neutriphila Hirschler-Réa et al. 2003, sp. nov.
¤ Halorubrobacterium Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, gen. nov.
Halorubrobacterium coriense corrig. Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, sp. nov.
Halorubrobacterium distributum (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrobacterium lacusprofundi (Franzmann et al. 1989) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrobacterium saccharovorum (Tomlinson and Hochstein 1977) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrobacterium sodomense (Oren 1983) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
¤ Halorubrum McGenity and Grant 1996, gen. nov.
Halorubrum aidingense Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum alkaliphilum Feng et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halorubrum arcis Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halorubrum coriense (Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996) Oren and Ventosa 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum distributum (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989) Oren and Ventosa 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum ejinorense Castillo et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halorubrum ezzemoulense Kharroub et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum lacusprofundi (Franzmann et al. 1989) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum lipolyticum Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum litoreum Cui et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halorubrum orientale Castillo et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum saccharovorum (Tomlinson and Hochstein 1977) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum sodomense (Oren 1983) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum tebenquichense Lizama et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halorubrum terrestre Ventosa et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halorubrum tibetense Fan et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halorubrum trapanicum (Petter 1931) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum vacuolatum (Mwatha and Grant 1993) Kamekura et al. 1997, comb. nov.
Halorubrum xinjiangense Feng et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Halosimplex Vreeland et al. 2003 (authorship reads Vreeland, Rosenzweig, Straight, Krammes, Dougherty and Kamekura), gen. nov.
Halosimplex carlsbadense Vreeland et al. 2003, sp. nov.
¤ Halospina Sorokin et al. 2006, gen. nov.
Halospina denitrificans Sorokin et al. 2006, sp. nov.
¤ Halospirulina Nübel et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Halospirulina tapeticola Nübel et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Halostagnicola Castillo et al. 2006, gen. nov.
Halostagnicola larsenii Castillo et al. 2006, sp. nov.
¤ Halotalea Ntougias et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Halotalea alkalilenta Ntougias et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Haloterrigena Ventosa et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Haloterrigena hispanica Romano et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena limicola Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena longa Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena saccharevitans Xu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena thermotolerans Montalvo-Rodríguez et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena turkmenica (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989) Ventosa et al. 1999, comb. nov.
¤ Halothermothrix Cayol et al. 1994, gen. nov.
Halothermothrix orenii Cayol et al. 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Halothiobacillaceae Kelly and Wood 2005, fam. nov.
¤ Halothiobacillus Kelly and Wood 2000, gen. nov.
Halothiobacillus halophilus (Wood and Kelly 1995) Kelly and Wood 2000, comb. nov.
Halothiobacillus hydrothermalis (Durand et al. 1997) Kelly and Wood 2000, comb. nov.
Halothiobacillus kellyi Sievert et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Halothiobacillus neapolitanus (Parker 1957) Kelly and Wood 2000, comb. nov.
¤ Halovibrio Fendrich 1989, gen. nov.
Halovibrio denitrificans Sorokin et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halovibrio variabilis Fendrich 1989, sp. nov.
¤ Halovivax Castillo et al. 2006, gen. nov.
Halovivax asiaticus Castillo et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halovivax ruber Castillo et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Helcococcus Collins et al. 1993, gen. nov.
Helcococcus kunzii Collins et al. 1993, sp. nov.
Helcococcus ovis Collins et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Helcococcus sueciensis Collins et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Helicobacter Goodwin et al. 1989, gen. nov.
Helicobacter acinonychis corrig. Eaton et al. 1993, sp. nov.
Helicobacter anseris Fox et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter aurati Patterson et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Helicobacter bilis Fox et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter bizzozeronii Hänninen et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Helicobacter brantae Fox et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter canadensis Fox et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Helicobacter canis Stanley et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Helicobacter cetorum Harper et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter cholecystus Franklin et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter cinaedi (Totten et al. 1988) Vandamme et al. 1991, comb. nov.
Helicobacter cynogastricus Van den Bulck et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter equorum Moyaert et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Helicobacter felis Paster et al. 1991, sp. nov.
Helicobacter fennelliae (Totten et al. 1988) Vandamme et al. 1991, comb. nov.
Helicobacter ganmani Robertson et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Helicobacter hepaticus Fox et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Helicobacter marmotae Fox et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter mastomyrinus Shen et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter mesocricetorum Simmons et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Helicobacter muridarum Lee et al. 1992, sp. nov.
Helicobacter mustelae (Fox et al. 1988) Goodwin et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Helicobacter nemestrinae Bronsdon et al. 1991, sp. nov.
Helicobacter pametensis Dewhirst et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Helicobacter pullorum Stanley et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Helicobacter pylori (Marshall et al. 1985) Goodwin et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Helicobacter rodentium Shen et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter salomonis Jalava et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter trogontum Mendes et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Helicobacter typhlonius Franklin et al. 2002, sp. nov.
¤ Helicobacteraceae Garrity et al. 2006, fam. nov.
¤ Heliobacillus Beer-Romero and Gest 1998, gen. nov.
Heliobacillus mobilis Beer-Romero and Gest 1998, sp. nov.
¤ Heliobacterium Gest and Favinger 1985, gen. nov.
Heliobacterium chlorum Gest and Favinger 1985, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium gestii Ormerod et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium modesticaldum Kimble et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium sulfidophilum Bryantseva et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium undosum Bryantseva et al. 2001, sp. nov.
¤ Heliophilum Ormerod et al. 1996, gen. nov.
Heliophilum fasciatum Ormerod et al. 1996, sp. nov.
¤ Heliorestis Bryantseva et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Heliorestis baculata Bryantseva et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Heliorestis daurensis Bryantseva et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Heliothrix Pierson et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Heliothrix oregonensis Pierson et al. 1986, sp. nov.
¤ Herbaspirillum Baldani et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Herbaspirillum autotrophicum (Aragno and Schlegel 1978) Ding and Yokota 2004, comb. nov.
Herbaspirillum chlorophenolicum Im et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum frisingense Kirchhof et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum hiltneri Rothballer et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum huttiense (Leifson 1962) Ding and Yokota 2004, comb. nov.
Herbaspirillum lusitanum Valverde et al. 2003, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum putei Ding and Yokota 2004, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum rhizosphaerae Jung et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans (Christopher and Edgerton 1930) Baldani et al. 1996, comb. nov.
Herbaspirillum seropedicae Baldani et al. 1986, sp. nov.
¤ Herbidospora Kudo et al. 1993, gen. nov.
Herbidospora cretacea Kudo et al. 1993, sp. nov.
¤ Herminiimonas Fernandes et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Herminiimonas aquatilis Kämpfer et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans Muller et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Herminiimonas fonticola Fernandes et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Herminiimonas saxobsidens Lang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Herpetosiphon Holt and Lewin 1968 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Herpetosiphon aurantiacus Holt and Lewin 1968 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon cohaerens Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon geysericola (Copeland 1936) Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon nigricans Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon persicus Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Hespellia Whitehead et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hespellia porcina Whitehead et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Hespellia stercorisuis Whitehead et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hippea Miroshnichenko et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Hippea maritima Miroshnichenko et al. 1999, sp. nov.
¤ Hirschia Schlesner et al. 1990, gen. nov.
Hirschia baltica Schlesner et al. 1990, sp. nov.
¤ Histophilus Angen et al. 2003, gen. nov.
Histophilus somni Angen et al. 2003, sp. nov.
¤ Hoeflea Peix et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Hoeflea alexandrii Palacios et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hoeflea marina Peix et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Hoeflea phototrophica Biebl et al. 2006, sp. nov.
¤ Holdemania Willems et al. 1997, gen. nov.
Holdemania filiformis Willems et al. 1997, sp. nov.
¤ Hollandina (ex To et al. 1978) Bermudes et al. 1988, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Hollandina pterotermitidis (ex To et al. 1978) Bermudes et al. 1988, sp. nov., nom. rev.
¤ Holophaga Liesack et al. 1995, gen. nov.
Holophaga foetida Liesack et al. 1995, sp. nov.
¤ Holospora (ex Hafkine 1890) Gromov and Ossipov 1981, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora caryophila (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982, nom. rev., comb. nov.
Holospora elegans (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora obtusa (ex Hafkine 1890) Gromov and Ossipov 1981, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora obtusa (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora undulata (ex Hafkine 1890) Gromov and Ossipov 1981, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora undulata (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, sp. nov., nom. rev.
¤ Holosporaceae Görtz and Schmidt 2006, fam. nov.
¤ Hongia Lee et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Hongia koreensis Lee et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Hongiella Yi and Chun 2004, gen. nov.
Hongiella halophila Yi and Chun 2004, sp. nov.
Hongiella mannitolivorans Yi and Chun 2004, sp. nov.
Hongiella marincola Yoon et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Hongiella ornithinivorans Yi and Chun 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hormogoneae Cavalier-Smith 2002, class. nov.
¤ Howardella Cook et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Howardella ureilytica Cook et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Humicoccus Yoon et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Humicoccus flavidus Yoon et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Humihabitans Kageyama et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Humihabitans oryzae Kageyama et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Hyalangium Reichenbach 2007, gen. nov.
Hyalangium minutum Reichenbach 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrocarboniphaga Palleroni et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hydrocarboniphaga effusa Palleroni et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenimonas Takai et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hydrogenimonas thermophila Takai et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenivirga Nakagawa et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hydrogenivirga caldilitoris Nakagawa et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenobacter Kawasumi et al. 1984, gen. nov.
Hydrogenobacter acidophilus Shima and Suzuki 1993, sp. nov.
Hydrogenobacter hydrogenophilus (Kryukov et al. 1984) Stöhr et al. 2001, comb. nov.
Hydrogenobacter subterraneus Takai et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hydrogenobacter thermophilus Kawasumi et al. 1984, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenobaculum Stöhr et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Hydrogenobaculum acidophilum (Shima and Suzuki 1993) Stöhr et al. 2001, comb. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophaga Willems et al. 1989, gen. nov.
Hydrogenophaga atypica Kämpfer et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga caeni Chung et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga defluvii Kämpfer et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga flava (Niklewski 1910) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Hydrogenophaga intermedia Contzen et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga palleronii (Davis 1970) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (Auling et al. 1978) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis (Lalucat et al. 1982) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophilaceae Garrity et al. 2006, fam. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophilales Garrity et al. 2006, ord. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophilus Hayashi et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Hydrogenophilus hirschii Stöhr et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophilus thermoluteolus Hayashi et al. 1999, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenothermaceae Eder and Huber 2003, fam. nov.
¤ Hydrogenothermus Stöhr et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Hydrogenothermus marinus Stöhr et al. 2001, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenovibrio Nishihara et al. 1991, gen. nov.
Hydrogenovibrio marinus Nishihara et al. 1991, sp. nov.
¤ Hylemonella Spring et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hylemonella gracilis (Canale-Parola et al. 1966) Spring et al. 2004, comb. nov.
¤ Hymenobacter Hirsch et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Hymenobacter actinosclerus Collins et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter aerophilus Buczolits et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter chitinivorans Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter gelipurpurascens Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter norwichensis Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter ocellatus Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter rigui Baik et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter roseosalivarius Hirsch et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter xinjiangensis Zhang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Hyperthermus Zillig et al. 1991, gen. nov.
Hyperthermus butylicus Zillig et al. 1991, sp. nov.
¤ Hyphomicrobiaceae Babudieri 1950 (Approved Lists 1980), familia.
¤ Hyphomicrobiales Douglas 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), ordo.
¤ Hyphomicrobium Stutzer and Hartleb 1899 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Hyphomicrobium aestuarii Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium chloromethanicum McDonald et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium coagulans (ex Takada 1975) Hirsch 1989, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Hyphomicrobium denitrificans Urakami et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile corrig. Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile subsp. facile corrig. Hirsch 1989, subsp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile subsp. tolerans corrig. Hirsch 1989, subsp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile subsp. ureaphilum corrig. Hirsch 1989, subsp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium hollandicum Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium indicum Johnson and Weisrock 1969 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Hyphomicrobium methylovorum Izumi et al. 1983, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium neptunium Leifson 1964 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Hyphomicrobium sulfonivorans Borodina et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium vulgare Stutzer and Hartleb 1898 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Hyphomicrobium zavarzinii Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
¤ Hyphomonadaceae Lee et al. 2005, fam. nov.
¤ Hyphomonas (ex Pongratz 1957) Moore et al. 1984, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Hyphomonas adhaerens Weiner et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas hirschiana Weiner et al. 1985, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas jannaschiana Weiner et al. 1985, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas johnsonii Weiner et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas neptunium (Leifson 1964) Moore et al. 1984, comb. nov.
Hyphomonas oceanitis Weiner et al. 1985, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas polymorpha (ex Pongratz 1957) Moore et al. 1984, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al. 2000, sp. nov.
fuchsia
Bacteria H?
Only one coming to mind is helicobacter pylori. Affects the stomach and duodenum, causing ulcers, gastritis, etc.
Reply:¤ Hafnia Møller 1954 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Hafnia alvei Møller 1954 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Hahella Lee et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Hahella chejuensis Lee et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hahella ganghwensis Baik et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Hahellaceae Garrity et al. 2005, fam. nov.
¤ Haladaptatus Savage et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Haladaptatus paucihalophilus Savage et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Halalkalibacillus Echigo et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Halalkalibacillus halophilus Echigo et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Halalkalicoccus Xue et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Halalkalicoccus jeotgali Roh et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halalkalicoccus tibetensis Xue et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Halanaerobacter corrig. Liaw and Mah 1996, gen. nov.
Halanaerobacter chitinivorans corrig. Liaw and Mah 1996, sp. nov.
Halanaerobacter lacunarum corrig. (Zhilina et al. 1992) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobacter salinarius Mouné et al. 1999, sp. nov.
¤ Halanaerobiaceae corrig. Oren et al. 1984, fam. nov.
¤ Halanaerobiales corrig. Rainey and Zhilina 1995, ord. nov.
¤ Halanaerobium corrig. Zeikus et al. 1984, gen. nov.
Halanaerobium acetethylicum corrig. (Rengpipat et al. 1989) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium alcaliphilum corrig. Tsai et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium congolense corrig. Ravot et al. 1998, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium fermentans corrig. Kobayashi et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium kushneri corrig. Bhupathiraju et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium lacusrosei corrig. Cayol et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium praevalens corrig. Zeikus et al. 1984, sp. nov.
Halanaerobium saccharolyticum corrig. (Zhilina et al. 1992) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium saccharolyticum subsp. saccharolyticum corrig. (Zhilina et al. 1992) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium saccharolyticum subsp. senegalense corrig. (Cayol et al. 1994) Rainey et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halanaerobium salsuginis corrig. Bhupathiraju et al. 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Haliangium Fudou et al. 2002, gen. nov.
Haliangium ochraceum Fudou et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Haliangium tepidum Fudou et al. 2002, sp. nov.
¤ Haliscomenobacter van Veen et al. 1973 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Haliscomenobacter hydrossis van Veen et al. 1973 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Hallella Moore and Moore 1994, gen. nov.
Hallella seregens Moore and Moore 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Haloarcula Torreblanca et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Haloarcula amylolytica Yang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloarcula argentinensis Ihara et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Haloarcula hispanica Juez et al. 1986, sp. nov.
Haloarcula japonica Takashina et al. 1991, sp. nov.
Haloarcula marismortui (ex Volcani 1940) Oren et al. 1990, nom. rev., comb. nov.
Haloarcula mukohataei Ihara et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Haloarcula quadrata Oren et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Haloarcula vallismortis (Gonzalez et al. 1979) Torreblanca et al. 1986, comb. nov.
¤ Halobacillus Spring et al. 1996, gen. nov.
Halobacillus aidingensis Liu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobacillus campisalis Yoon et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus dabanensis Liu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobacillus faecis An et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus halophilus (Claus et al. 1984) Spring et al. 1996, comb. nov.
Halobacillus karajensis Amoozegar et al. 2003, sp. nov.
Halobacillus kuroshimensis Hua et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus litoralis Spring et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halobacillus locisalis Yoon et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halobacillus profundi Hua et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halobacillus salinus Yoon et al. 2003, sp. nov.
Halobacillus trueperi Spring et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halobacillus yeomjeoni Yoon et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Halobacteria Grant et al. 2002, class. nov.
¤ Halobacteriaceae Gibbons 1974 (Approved Lists 1980), familia.
¤ Halobacteriales Grant and Larsen 1989, ord. nov.
¤ Halobacterium Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Halobacterium cutirubrum (Lochhead 1934) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium denitrificans Tomlinson et al. 1986, sp. nov.
Halobacterium distributum corrig. Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989, sp. nov.
Halobacterium halobium (Petter 1931) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium jilantaiense Yang et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halobacterium lacusprofundi Franzmann et al. 1989, sp. nov.
Halobacterium mediterranei Rodriguez-Valera et al. 1983, sp. nov.
Halobacterium noricense Gruber et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobacterium pharaonis Soliman and Trüper 1983, sp. nov.
Halobacterium saccharovorum Tomlinson and Hochstein 1977 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium salinarum corrig. (Harrison and Kennedy 1922) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium sodomense Oren 1983, sp. nov.
Halobacterium trapanicum (Petter 1931) Elazari-Volcani 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium vallismortis Gonzalez et al. 1979 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halobacterium volcanii Mullakhanbhai and Larsen 1975 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Halobacteroidaceae Zhilina and Rainey 1995, fam. nov.
¤ Halobacteroides Oren et al. 1984, gen. nov.
Halobacteroides acetoethylicus Rengpipat et al. 1989, sp. nov.
Halobacteroides elegans Zhilina et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Halobacteroides halobius Oren et al. 1984, sp. nov.
Halobacteroides lacunaris Zhilina et al. 1992, sp. nov.
¤ Halobaculum Oren et al. 1995, gen. nov.
Halobaculum gomorrense Oren et al. 1995, sp. nov.
¤ Halobiforma Hezayen et al. 2002, gen. nov.
Halobiforma haloterrestris Hezayen et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halobiforma lacisalsi Xu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halobiforma nitratireducens (Xin et al. 2001) Hezayen et al. 2002, comb. nov.
¤ Halocella Simankova et al. 1994, gen. nov.
Halocella cellulosilytica corrig. Simankova et al. 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Halochromatium Imhoff et al. 1998, gen. nov.
Halochromatium glycolicum (Caumette et al. 1997) Imhoff et al. 1998, comb. nov.
Halochromatium roseum Anil Kumar et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halochromatium salexigens (Caumette et al. 1989) Imhoff et al. 1998, comb. nov.
¤ Halococcus Schoop 1935 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Halococcus dombrowskii Stan-Lotter et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halococcus hamelinensis Goh et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halococcus morrhuae (Farlow 1880) Kocur and Hodgkiss 1973 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Halococcus qingdaonensis Wang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halococcus saccharolyticus Montero et al. 1990, sp. nov.
Halococcus salifodinae Denner et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Halococcus thailandensis Namwong et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halococcus turkmenicus Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989, sp. nov.
¤ Haloferax Torreblanca et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Haloferax alexandrinus Asker and Ohta 2002, sp. nov.
Haloferax denitrificans (Tomlinson et al. 1986) Tindall et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Haloferax gibbonsii Juez et al. 1986, sp. nov.
Haloferax larsenii Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloferax lucentense corrig. Gutierrez et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Haloferax mediterranei (Rodriguez-Valera et al. 1983) Torreblanca et al. 1987, comb. nov.
Haloferax prahovense Enache et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloferax sulfurifontis Elshahed et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Haloferax volcanii (Mullakhanbhai and Larsen 1975) Torreblanca et al. 1986, comb. nov.
¤ Halogeometricum Montalvo-Rodríguez et al. 1998, gen. nov.
Halogeometricum borinquense Montalvo-Rodríguez et al. 1998, sp. nov.
¤ Haloincola Zhilina et al. 1992, gen. nov.
Haloincola saccharolyticus corrig. Zhilina et al. 1992, sp. nov.
Haloincola saccharolyticus subsp. saccharolyticus corrig. Zhilina et al. 1992, subsp. nov.
Haloincola saccharolyticus subsp. senegalensis corrig. Cayol et al. 1994, subsp. nov.
¤ Halolactibacillus Ishikawa et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Halolactibacillus halophilus Ishikawa et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halolactibacillus miurensis Ishikawa et al. 2005, sp. nov.
¤ Halomebacteria Cavalier-Smith 2002, class. nov.
¤ Halomethanococcus Yu and Kawamura 1988, gen. nov.
Halomethanococcus doii Yu and Kawamura 1988, sp. nov.
¤ Halomicrobium Oren et al. 2002, gen. nov.
Halomicrobium mukohataei (Ihara et al. 1997) Oren et al. 2002, comb. nov.
¤ Halomonadaceae Franzmann et al. 1989, fam. nov.
¤ Halomonas Vreeland et al. 1980, gen. nov.
Halomonas alimentaria Yoon et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halomonas alkaliphila Romano et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas almeriensis Martínez-Checa et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halomonas anticariensis Martínez-Cánovas et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas aquamarina (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas arcis Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas avicenniae Soto-Ramírez et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas axialensis Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas boliviensis Quillaguamán et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas campaniensis Romano et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halomonas campisalis Mormile et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Halomonas canadensis Huval et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halomonas cupida (Baumann et al. 1972) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas denitrificans Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas desiderata Berendes et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Halomonas elongata Vreeland et al. 1980, sp. nov.
Halomonas eurihalina (Quesada et al. 1990) Mellado et al. 1995, comb. nov.
Halomonas gomseomensis Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas gudaonensis Wang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas halmophila (Elazari-Volcani 1940) Franzmann et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Halomonas halocynthiae Romanenko et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halomonas halodenitrificans (Robinson and Gibbons 1952) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas halodurans Hebert and Vreeland 1987, sp. nov.
Halomonas halophila (Quesada et al. 1984) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas hydrothermalis Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas indalinina Cabrera et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas israelensis Huval et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Halomonas janggokensis Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas koreensis Lim et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas kribbensis Jeon et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas magadiensis corrig. Duckworth et al. 2000 (complete authorship reads: Duckworth, Grant, Jones, Márquez and Ventosa), sp. nov.
Halomonas marina (Cobet et al. 1970) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas marisflavi corrig.Yoon et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Halomonas maura Bouchotroch et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Halomonas meridiana James et al. 1990, sp. nov.
Halomonas muralis Heyrman et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halomonas neptunia Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas organivorans García et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas pacifica (Baumann et al. 1972) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas pantelleriensis corrig. Romano et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Halomonas saccharevitans Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas salaria Kim et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas salina (Valderrama et al. 1991) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas shengliensis Wang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas subglaciescola Franzmann et al. 1987, sp. nov.
Halomonas subterranea Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halomonas sulfidaeris Kaye et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas taeanensis Lee et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halomonas variabilis (Fendrich 1989) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
Halomonas ventosae Martínez-Cánovas et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halomonas venusta (Baumann et al. 1972) Dobson and Franzmann 1996, comb. nov.
¤ Halonatronum Zhilina et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Halonatronum saccharophilum Zhilina et al. 2001, sp. nov.
¤ Halopiger Gutiérrez et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Halopiger xanaduensis Gutiérrez et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Haloplanus Elevi Bardavid et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Haloplanus natans Elevi Bardavid et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Haloquadratum Burns et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Haloquadratum walsbyi Burns et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Halorhabdus Wainø et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Halorhabdus utahensis Wainø et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Halorhodospira Imhoff and Süling 1997, gen. nov.
Halorhodospira abdelmalekii (Imhoff and Trüper 1982) Imhoff and Süling 1997, comb. nov.
Halorhodospira halochloris (Imhoff and Trüper 1979) Imhoff and Süling 1997, comb. nov.
Halorhodospira halophila (Raymond and Sistrom 1969) Imhoff and Süling 1997, comb. nov.
Halorhodospira neutriphila Hirschler-Réa et al. 2003, sp. nov.
¤ Halorubrobacterium Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, gen. nov.
Halorubrobacterium coriense corrig. Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, sp. nov.
Halorubrobacterium distributum (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrobacterium lacusprofundi (Franzmann et al. 1989) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrobacterium saccharovorum (Tomlinson and Hochstein 1977) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrobacterium sodomense (Oren 1983) Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996, comb. nov.
¤ Halorubrum McGenity and Grant 1996, gen. nov.
Halorubrum aidingense Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum alkaliphilum Feng et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Halorubrum arcis Xu et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halorubrum coriense (Kamekura and Dyall-Smith 1996) Oren and Ventosa 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum distributum (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989) Oren and Ventosa 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum ejinorense Castillo et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halorubrum ezzemoulense Kharroub et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum lacusprofundi (Franzmann et al. 1989) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum lipolyticum Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum litoreum Cui et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Halorubrum orientale Castillo et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halorubrum saccharovorum (Tomlinson and Hochstein 1977) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum sodomense (Oren 1983) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum tebenquichense Lizama et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Halorubrum terrestre Ventosa et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halorubrum tibetense Fan et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Halorubrum trapanicum (Petter 1931) McGenity and Grant 1996, comb. nov.
Halorubrum vacuolatum (Mwatha and Grant 1993) Kamekura et al. 1997, comb. nov.
Halorubrum xinjiangense Feng et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Halosimplex Vreeland et al. 2003 (authorship reads Vreeland, Rosenzweig, Straight, Krammes, Dougherty and Kamekura), gen. nov.
Halosimplex carlsbadense Vreeland et al. 2003, sp. nov.
¤ Halospina Sorokin et al. 2006, gen. nov.
Halospina denitrificans Sorokin et al. 2006, sp. nov.
¤ Halospirulina Nübel et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Halospirulina tapeticola Nübel et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Halostagnicola Castillo et al. 2006, gen. nov.
Halostagnicola larsenii Castillo et al. 2006, sp. nov.
¤ Halotalea Ntougias et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Halotalea alkalilenta Ntougias et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Haloterrigena Ventosa et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Haloterrigena hispanica Romano et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena limicola Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena longa Cui et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena saccharevitans Xu et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena thermotolerans Montalvo-Rodríguez et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Haloterrigena turkmenica (Zvyagintseva and Tarasov 1989) Ventosa et al. 1999, comb. nov.
¤ Halothermothrix Cayol et al. 1994, gen. nov.
Halothermothrix orenii Cayol et al. 1994, sp. nov.
¤ Halothiobacillaceae Kelly and Wood 2005, fam. nov.
¤ Halothiobacillus Kelly and Wood 2000, gen. nov.
Halothiobacillus halophilus (Wood and Kelly 1995) Kelly and Wood 2000, comb. nov.
Halothiobacillus hydrothermalis (Durand et al. 1997) Kelly and Wood 2000, comb. nov.
Halothiobacillus kellyi Sievert et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Halothiobacillus neapolitanus (Parker 1957) Kelly and Wood 2000, comb. nov.
¤ Halovibrio Fendrich 1989, gen. nov.
Halovibrio denitrificans Sorokin et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halovibrio variabilis Fendrich 1989, sp. nov.
¤ Halovivax Castillo et al. 2006, gen. nov.
Halovivax asiaticus Castillo et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Halovivax ruber Castillo et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Helcococcus Collins et al. 1993, gen. nov.
Helcococcus kunzii Collins et al. 1993, sp. nov.
Helcococcus ovis Collins et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Helcococcus sueciensis Collins et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Helicobacter Goodwin et al. 1989, gen. nov.
Helicobacter acinonychis corrig. Eaton et al. 1993, sp. nov.
Helicobacter anseris Fox et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter aurati Patterson et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Helicobacter bilis Fox et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter bizzozeronii Hänninen et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Helicobacter brantae Fox et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter canadensis Fox et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Helicobacter canis Stanley et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Helicobacter cetorum Harper et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter cholecystus Franklin et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter cinaedi (Totten et al. 1988) Vandamme et al. 1991, comb. nov.
Helicobacter cynogastricus Van den Bulck et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter equorum Moyaert et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Helicobacter felis Paster et al. 1991, sp. nov.
Helicobacter fennelliae (Totten et al. 1988) Vandamme et al. 1991, comb. nov.
Helicobacter ganmani Robertson et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Helicobacter hepaticus Fox et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Helicobacter marmotae Fox et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter mastomyrinus Shen et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Helicobacter mesocricetorum Simmons et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Helicobacter muridarum Lee et al. 1992, sp. nov.
Helicobacter mustelae (Fox et al. 1988) Goodwin et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Helicobacter nemestrinae Bronsdon et al. 1991, sp. nov.
Helicobacter pametensis Dewhirst et al. 1994, sp. nov.
Helicobacter pullorum Stanley et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Helicobacter pylori (Marshall et al. 1985) Goodwin et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Helicobacter rodentium Shen et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter salomonis Jalava et al. 1997, sp. nov.
Helicobacter trogontum Mendes et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Helicobacter typhlonius Franklin et al. 2002, sp. nov.
¤ Helicobacteraceae Garrity et al. 2006, fam. nov.
¤ Heliobacillus Beer-Romero and Gest 1998, gen. nov.
Heliobacillus mobilis Beer-Romero and Gest 1998, sp. nov.
¤ Heliobacterium Gest and Favinger 1985, gen. nov.
Heliobacterium chlorum Gest and Favinger 1985, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium gestii Ormerod et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium modesticaldum Kimble et al. 1996, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium sulfidophilum Bryantseva et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Heliobacterium undosum Bryantseva et al. 2001, sp. nov.
¤ Heliophilum Ormerod et al. 1996, gen. nov.
Heliophilum fasciatum Ormerod et al. 1996, sp. nov.
¤ Heliorestis Bryantseva et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Heliorestis baculata Bryantseva et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Heliorestis daurensis Bryantseva et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Heliothrix Pierson et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Heliothrix oregonensis Pierson et al. 1986, sp. nov.
¤ Herbaspirillum Baldani et al. 1986, gen. nov.
Herbaspirillum autotrophicum (Aragno and Schlegel 1978) Ding and Yokota 2004, comb. nov.
Herbaspirillum chlorophenolicum Im et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum frisingense Kirchhof et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum hiltneri Rothballer et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum huttiense (Leifson 1962) Ding and Yokota 2004, comb. nov.
Herbaspirillum lusitanum Valverde et al. 2003, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum putei Ding and Yokota 2004, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum rhizosphaerae Jung et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans (Christopher and Edgerton 1930) Baldani et al. 1996, comb. nov.
Herbaspirillum seropedicae Baldani et al. 1986, sp. nov.
¤ Herbidospora Kudo et al. 1993, gen. nov.
Herbidospora cretacea Kudo et al. 1993, sp. nov.
¤ Herminiimonas Fernandes et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Herminiimonas aquatilis Kämpfer et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Herminiimonas arsenicoxydans Muller et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Herminiimonas fonticola Fernandes et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Herminiimonas saxobsidens Lang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Herpetosiphon Holt and Lewin 1968 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Herpetosiphon aurantiacus Holt and Lewin 1968 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon cohaerens Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon geysericola (Copeland 1936) Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon nigricans Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Herpetosiphon persicus Lewin 1970 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
¤ Hespellia Whitehead et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hespellia porcina Whitehead et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Hespellia stercorisuis Whitehead et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hippea Miroshnichenko et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Hippea maritima Miroshnichenko et al. 1999, sp. nov.
¤ Hirschia Schlesner et al. 1990, gen. nov.
Hirschia baltica Schlesner et al. 1990, sp. nov.
¤ Histophilus Angen et al. 2003, gen. nov.
Histophilus somni Angen et al. 2003, sp. nov.
¤ Hoeflea Peix et al. 2005, gen. nov.
Hoeflea alexandrii Palacios et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hoeflea marina Peix et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Hoeflea phototrophica Biebl et al. 2006, sp. nov.
¤ Holdemania Willems et al. 1997, gen. nov.
Holdemania filiformis Willems et al. 1997, sp. nov.
¤ Hollandina (ex To et al. 1978) Bermudes et al. 1988, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Hollandina pterotermitidis (ex To et al. 1978) Bermudes et al. 1988, sp. nov., nom. rev.
¤ Holophaga Liesack et al. 1995, gen. nov.
Holophaga foetida Liesack et al. 1995, sp. nov.
¤ Holospora (ex Hafkine 1890) Gromov and Ossipov 1981, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora caryophila (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982, nom. rev., comb. nov.
Holospora elegans (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora obtusa (ex Hafkine 1890) Gromov and Ossipov 1981, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora obtusa (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora undulata (ex Hafkine 1890) Gromov and Ossipov 1981, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Holospora undulata (ex Hafkine 1890) Preer and Preer 1982, sp. nov., nom. rev.
¤ Holosporaceae Görtz and Schmidt 2006, fam. nov.
¤ Hongia Lee et al. 2000, gen. nov.
Hongia koreensis Lee et al. 2000, sp. nov.
¤ Hongiella Yi and Chun 2004, gen. nov.
Hongiella halophila Yi and Chun 2004, sp. nov.
Hongiella mannitolivorans Yi and Chun 2004, sp. nov.
Hongiella marincola Yoon et al. 2004, sp. nov.
Hongiella ornithinivorans Yi and Chun 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hormogoneae Cavalier-Smith 2002, class. nov.
¤ Howardella Cook et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Howardella ureilytica Cook et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Humicoccus Yoon et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Humicoccus flavidus Yoon et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Humihabitans Kageyama et al. 2007, gen. nov.
Humihabitans oryzae Kageyama et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Hyalangium Reichenbach 2007, gen. nov.
Hyalangium minutum Reichenbach 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrocarboniphaga Palleroni et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hydrocarboniphaga effusa Palleroni et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenimonas Takai et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hydrogenimonas thermophila Takai et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenivirga Nakagawa et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hydrogenivirga caldilitoris Nakagawa et al. 2004, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenobacter Kawasumi et al. 1984, gen. nov.
Hydrogenobacter acidophilus Shima and Suzuki 1993, sp. nov.
Hydrogenobacter hydrogenophilus (Kryukov et al. 1984) Stöhr et al. 2001, comb. nov.
Hydrogenobacter subterraneus Takai et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hydrogenobacter thermophilus Kawasumi et al. 1984, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenobaculum Stöhr et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Hydrogenobaculum acidophilum (Shima and Suzuki 1993) Stöhr et al. 2001, comb. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophaga Willems et al. 1989, gen. nov.
Hydrogenophaga atypica Kämpfer et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga caeni Chung et al. 2007, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga defluvii Kämpfer et al. 2005, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga flava (Niklewski 1910) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Hydrogenophaga intermedia Contzen et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophaga palleronii (Davis 1970) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (Auling et al. 1978) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
Hydrogenophaga taeniospiralis (Lalucat et al. 1982) Willems et al. 1989, comb. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophilaceae Garrity et al. 2006, fam. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophilales Garrity et al. 2006, ord. nov.
¤ Hydrogenophilus Hayashi et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Hydrogenophilus hirschii Stöhr et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hydrogenophilus thermoluteolus Hayashi et al. 1999, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenothermaceae Eder and Huber 2003, fam. nov.
¤ Hydrogenothermus Stöhr et al. 2001, gen. nov.
Hydrogenothermus marinus Stöhr et al. 2001, sp. nov.
¤ Hydrogenovibrio Nishihara et al. 1991, gen. nov.
Hydrogenovibrio marinus Nishihara et al. 1991, sp. nov.
¤ Hylemonella Spring et al. 2004, gen. nov.
Hylemonella gracilis (Canale-Parola et al. 1966) Spring et al. 2004, comb. nov.
¤ Hymenobacter Hirsch et al. 1999, gen. nov.
Hymenobacter actinosclerus Collins et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter aerophilus Buczolits et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter chitinivorans Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter gelipurpurascens Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter norwichensis Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter ocellatus Buczolits et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter rigui Baik et al. 2006, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter roseosalivarius Hirsch et al. 1999, sp. nov.
Hymenobacter xinjiangensis Zhang et al. 2007, sp. nov.
¤ Hyperthermus Zillig et al. 1991, gen. nov.
Hyperthermus butylicus Zillig et al. 1991, sp. nov.
¤ Hyphomicrobiaceae Babudieri 1950 (Approved Lists 1980), familia.
¤ Hyphomicrobiales Douglas 1957 (Approved Lists 1980), ordo.
¤ Hyphomicrobium Stutzer and Hartleb 1899 (Approved Lists 1980), genus.
Hyphomicrobium aestuarii Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium chloromethanicum McDonald et al. 2001, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium coagulans (ex Takada 1975) Hirsch 1989, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Hyphomicrobium denitrificans Urakami et al. 1995, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile corrig. Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile subsp. facile corrig. Hirsch 1989, subsp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile subsp. tolerans corrig. Hirsch 1989, subsp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium facile subsp. ureaphilum corrig. Hirsch 1989, subsp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium hollandicum Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium indicum Johnson and Weisrock 1969 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Hyphomicrobium methylovorum Izumi et al. 1983, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium neptunium Leifson 1964 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Hyphomicrobium sulfonivorans Borodina et al. 2002, sp. nov.
Hyphomicrobium vulgare Stutzer and Hartleb 1898 (Approved Lists 1980), species.
Hyphomicrobium zavarzinii Hirsch 1989, sp. nov.
¤ Hyphomonadaceae Lee et al. 2005, fam. nov.
¤ Hyphomonas (ex Pongratz 1957) Moore et al. 1984, gen. nov., nom. rev.
Hyphomonas adhaerens Weiner et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas hirschiana Weiner et al. 1985, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas jannaschiana Weiner et al. 1985, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas johnsonii Weiner et al. 2000, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas neptunium (Leifson 1964) Moore et al. 1984, comb. nov.
Hyphomonas oceanitis Weiner et al. 1985, sp. nov.
Hyphomonas polymorpha (ex Pongratz 1957) Moore et al. 1984, sp. nov., nom. rev.
Hyphomonas rosenbergii Weiner et al. 2000, sp. nov.
fuchsia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)